75
submitted 10 months ago by LukeSky@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It depends on if you trust Meta. Generally speaking there is end-to-end encryption in WhatsApp, which means only you and the person you chat with can decrypt your messages / media (source). I believe there are some weak spots in group chats, mostly caused by users themselves. Not sure about the new Community function but I'd be careful with what I share there.

Some parties like Apple have decided to scan photos from your device for illegal material (edit: after backlash they dropped this for now, my bad). If using an app like WhatsApp I'd personally be aware that something like that might happen in the future as well. I'd not be surprised if some employees might (temporarily) be able to access more data than widely assumed, for debugging reasons in case of bugs.

Personally I take the risk for pragmatic reasons, but it doesn't hurt to be a bit cautious / aware.

[-] neshura@bookwormstory.social 2 points 10 months ago

iirc Microsoft is doing it, read of a case where a parent sent a picture of his son to the doctor via onedrove share and his entire account got suspended over it.

[-] kirklennon@kbin.social -5 points 10 months ago

Some parties like Apple have decided to scan photos from your device for illegal material.

No they haven’t, they aren’t, and they never even discussed scanning your messages like that. There’s a communication safety feature available to enable in parental controls so that if a child’s phone locally recognizes (using machine learning) that they received or are about to send a nude photo, the receiving photo is blurred and they’re given information about making safe choices and then allowed to continue or not.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

No they haven’t, they aren’t, and they never even discussed scanning your messages like that.

They discussed it (source) but the backlash was enough to kill the project for now. Instead, they implemented the "opt-in" system you are talking about.

[-] kirklennon@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

They discussed something adjacent, not anything that would scan and disclose your encrypted messages.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thanks for correcting me, you are right about the image scanning. Added an edit to my statement.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
75 points (92.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
1487 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS