620
submitted 10 months ago by Aboel3z@programming.dev to c/economics@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

That is the opposite of risk. A risk is something you do with a poor chance of success, possibly with a good reward if successful. What you're describing is a guarantee. Now look at the returns on guaranteed interest certificates and the high-risk stocks. Sure, some of the high-risk stocks outperform the guaranteed certificates, but many also end up being worth nothing.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Risk exists on a spectrum. US Treasury Bonds would be about the lowest risk asset you can invest in, but there's always risk at some level that the dipshit Republicans in Congress finally manage to blow up the bond market.

A healthy economy has a good mix of creation of new businesses, destruction of inefficient businesses, and retention of businesses that are well run. The family run corner grocery store may just not need to grow and change much.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Yes, exactly. Businesses should be less risky to open and that should be paid for by larger corporate taxes. Coca Cola is selling sugar water that costs 50¢ for a dollar. They can afford higher taxes because of their huge brand name. And I own shares of Coca Cola.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
620 points (97.0% liked)

Economics

1713 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS