261
Special counsel Jack Smith hits back at Trump’s immunity claims
(www.independent.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
261 points (96.4% liked)
News
30335 readers
2892 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Remember that half of Congress is under GOP control. How should the Dems holds the court to account when they don't have the congressional control necessary?
I mean, I agree with you in general, Democrats are very unwilling to take off the gloves (this is actually a good thing, even if it is frustrating). Let's not layer on something they politically just cannot bring about.
Yeah....no. This has repeatedly proved itself to be an incredibly naive position. The bending over backwards for bipartisanship rather than going on the attack against the conservative cult has been a fucking disaster for this country.
I agree we have reached the point to take off the gloves. I am saying it is better that Democrats have, in general, tried to play by the rules as intended. We want people to want to be ethical.
Being a slave to the performative and procedural decorum when fighting a terrorist organization masquerading as a political party has worked out about as well as bringing a knife to a gun fight. There are so many instances where Democrats had Republicans by the proverbial throat, and had the opportunity to deliver real change for the American people.
Almost without fail they have ceded that advantage in favor of not upsetting the status quo, and then claiming later it was in all of our best interest even though Republicans turn around and blow up our institutions anyway. You're lying to yourself if you think that has been a winning strategy, or that it has anything to do with ethics.