626
submitted 10 months ago by jennwiththesea@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Excerpts:

"Seattle responded to the request by filing a lawsuit in Travis County, stating they cannot comply because Texas has no jurisdiction in Washington State, and no care was provided by the hospital in Texas. They also point out that the Dormant Commerce Clause, protected by the United States Constitution, “protects the right to interstate travel, including to obtain healthcare services.” By targeting out-of-state hospitals for enforcement of laws that only apply within the jurisdiction of Texas, they “discriminate against healthcare based on an interstate element,” violating constitutional protections, according to the legal filing. Lastly, Seattle Children’s Hospital cannot comply due to a shield law passed by Washington State. This law bars the hospital from providing any patient data and from responding to subpoenas pursuant to “protected healthcare services” obtained within the jurisdiction of Washington. Protected healthcare services include abortion, reproductive care, and gender-affirming care."

"This case promises to be extraordinarily complex. Seattle Children’s Hospital is challenging the jurisdiction of the demands directly in a Texas state court. Regardless of what the local court decides, the claims are likely to go to the Texas Supreme Court. Given that the claims also have a time limit on them and that appeals in Texas automatically favor the attorney general due to an automatic lifting of stays in the state, Seattle Children’s Hospital workers and providers for trans patients from Texas could be under legal jeopardy. Ultimately, the case presents questions of conflicting state laws and regulation of conduct across state lines, and the implications of those laws could be dire for abortion and trans care nationwide."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MamboGator@lemmy.world 185 points 10 months ago

"State's rights! Unless you're a progressive state in which case fuck you, obey me!"

Just more fuel for my belief that conservatives worldwide are either suffering from major brain damage because they were exposed to too much lead and other harmful chemicals as children due to corporate deregulation, or they're just evil. Most likely a combination of both. The evil ones are at the top and the brain damaged ones keep supporting them.

Nothing conservatives say or do makes sense otherwise.

[-] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 69 points 10 months ago

remember when they all bitched and moaned about 'government death panels'?

like it hadn't been going on already at the insurance companies.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 34 points 10 months ago

But if your insurance denies you, you can just come up with the millions of dollars you need yourself, so it's not a death panel! /s

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Government death panels bad.

Free market corporate death panels good.

[-] Voytrekk@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I want to be able to choose my death panel in the free market!

[-] Salad_Fries@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I want (my employer) to be able to choose my death panel (without my input, based on how it affects their shareholder profits) in the free market!

Fixed it for you ;)

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The logic there being that insurance companies have a profit incentive to not deny care.

[-] darkstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 10 months ago

It makes perfect sense. It's about control by any means. The fact of the matter is that, by definition, conservatives don't want progress. They'll say and do anything to stand in the way of progress, even if it's contradictory.

[-] MamboGator@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But that would be the "evil" component.

I should also add that defunding education and pushing religion in schools is a part of the brain damage component, albeit not chemically induced. And as the old guard conservatives who were intelligent but evil are dying off, we're starting to see more of the brain damaged/stupid ones enter positions of authority.

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

suffering from major brain damage because they were exposed to too much lead and other harmful chemicals as children due to corporate deregulation

As someone old enough to having played with all these wooden toys coated in shiny lead-based colors followed by plastics with even more harmful chemicals... I'm pretty sure you have to start with a lot of damage already, then develop the habit of trying to eat your toys. Which is a gateway drug to drinking bleach.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

It's the lead they used to put in gas that was the real problem. Up until a few decades ago basically everyone was regularly exposed to unhealthy levels of environmental lead because of leaded gas. It mostly has an impact on children so it's really just the Boomers and older GenX who grew up exposed that are still around with lead-addled brains, instead of all of society like it used to be before the switch to unleaded gas.

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

People always think that if you invent a Time Machine you should kill Hitler when he was a kid. Screw that, the man we really need to kill as a kid is Thomas Midgley Jr.. Dude invented both Tetraethyllead and CFCs.

Lead gas is also still in use! There are lots of old planes that take higher octane gas, and because rich people tend to own planes, the government allows aviation fuel to still have lead, leading to poisoning children that happen to live downwind general aviation airports. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/20/aviation-lead-fuel-00081641

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Im still in favor of shooting Woodrow Wilson with an anti-material rifle, that or convince the republican national convention to choose Roosevelt.

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

When regular leaded gas was banned in my country I was nearly 6, 14 when the last leaded high-octane gas was sold...

I looked up the US for reference... to find 1996 as the year leaded gas was finally banned.

So I still don't believe environment-induced brain damage is an excuse.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's not exactly an excuse but it does explain certain things. For example, the massive drop in violent crimes that began after kids stopped growing up with too much lead in their brains.

[-] Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The US banned leaded gas for all cars on the road in 1996 but we phased it out much earlier. The Clean air act was passed in 1970 which created the EPA. The EPA set standards on how much carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and hydrocarbons cars could have in their exhaust. To meet those standards automakers had to use catalytic converters and leaded gas destroys catalytic converters quickly. Because of this no new car introduced in the US since 1975 has used leaded gas. It was banned about 20 years later to let the old cars be operated through their normal lifecycle. We still use lead on n some aviation fuel.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

For most of that 20 year transition, gas stations had a choice of leaded or unleaded gas. I got my license in ‘82, and never drove a vehicle that still used leaded gas

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 10 months ago

My state's rights.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
626 points (97.6% liked)

News

23367 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS