159
submitted 10 months ago by FirstCircle@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

An NPR review of social media posts, speeches and interviews found that Trump has made calls to "free" Jan. 6 defendants or promised to issue them presidential pardons more than a dozen times. Trump has said he would issue those pardons on "day one" of his presidency, as part of a broader agenda to use presidential power to exact "retribution" against his opponents and deliver "justice" for his supporters.

"We'll be looking very, very seriously at full pardons," Trump told an interviewer in 2022. "I mean full pardons with an apology to many."

"LET THE JANUARY 6 PRISONERS GO," Trump posted on his social media site, Truth Social, in March 2023.

Later that year, Trump re-posted a Truth Social post stating, "The cops should be charged and the protesters should be freed."

In the immediate term, a pardon for Jan. 6 defendants would free them from prison as well as other court-ordered supervision, and end ongoing prosecutions. The pardon would also allow the hundreds of defendants convicted of felonies to legally own guns again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

How would a turkey plead guilty to avoid slaughter? Of course it had to be overturned

#bigbrain

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Great example of the Dunning-Kruger effect right here people.

Basically if people were already in prison, they've ALREADY been found guilty.

The argument was, by taking a pardon, is the person themselves admitting guilt or not.

[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And my argument (explaining the joke always improve it) why there can be no stipulation of the pardoned to need to admit fault is the turkey who gets pardoned each year.

Since the turkey cannot admit guilt, it can only be pardoned in a system where there is no such prerequisite to pardoning

I answered to a post exclaiming surprise that there is no need to admit guilt with a silly point about why such a law wouldn't be able to exist

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
159 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
291 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS