50
submitted 10 months ago by filoria@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

After the dissolution of the SU, you had a friendly Russia and an expectations that NATO is going to disband especially since the Warsaw pact was a reaction to it. Why have NATO still? Who was the enemy? (No it's not a Defensive force and never was). The disbanding never happened. Even Putins Russia tried to join it 3-4 times. When you see former Warsaw pact members change regime and join NATO shortly afterwards you know what's up and what's coming for you. Invading Ukraine was preemptive and a reaction to NATO expansion. It's the causus belli. So yes you have it reversed. Even war hawks like Mearshheimer ane Kissinger are/were saying this

[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago

Sure, if that's your take there is no use further discussing it.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
50 points (73.6% liked)

World News

32359 readers
387 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS