88
He doesn't look devastated, he looks fucking furious.
(hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)
news
23571 readers
694 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
That last paragraph is really reaching for that "passive voice" there. I think this is the most I've ever seen it stretched. Like...uhh...he's not upset because this is just a run of the mill defamation case guys, he's upset because his fucked up pedo shit is getting exposed.
I wonder what goes through the head of a journalist like this? How do they write something like this? Actively trying to defend a pedophile in the most slimy, weaselly way possible. Did they finish their article and down an entire bottle of rum when they got home? Did they sob hysterically and resolve to quit their job? Will they ever be able to make eye contact with a mirror after this? Who am I kidding, the person who wrote this is probably an absolutely reprehensible person completely lacking any empathy for others. Seems like that's more of a prerequisite for western "journalists" these days than it is for CEOs.
It's from a right wing british tabloid media. Chances are the journalist in question is also a either a pedo or at least friends with a couple of them. British right wing journalism is filled with people who also went to Eton and other schools with rampant sex-abuse, so I assume the journalist is completely fine with writing this kind of drivel.