374
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spider@lemmy.nz 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We're stuck with only a small slice of Dems that even acknowledge our system is fucked.

Which explains why Bernie Sanders got sacked in their presidential primaries, twice.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That was vague, my bad.

I ~~might~~ meant a small slice of dem politicians.

Voters of the Dem party and independents largely support healthcare reform, and even a good amount of Republicans.

But the party keeps supporting incumbents who don't represent their voters.

Just a bunch of old politicians deciding it's best for all of them to stay in power because they know better than voters.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That was vague, my bad.

I [meant] a small slice of dem politicians.

Oh, that was understood.

And what I meant was that the party itself orchestrated his sacking.

[-] Reality_Suit@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

No problem. I have made the comment about both sides suck and it doesn't matter before. It really feels that way all the time. I have said before : Republicans act like they care.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago

The winner of the Primary being supported by the Party is how it is supposed to work. And regardless of your purity and infallibility, there shall remain only two candidates with a viable chance. If fools whining doesn't damage Biden too much, the winner shall be he. But whine enough and you may suppress turn out enough to elect Fat Joffrey again.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But whine enough and you may suppress turn out enough to elect Fat Joffrey again.

I could say the same about whiny Democratic partisans trying to pin the blame on leftists yet again despite continuing to offer fuck-all as incentives. "Fuck you, vote for us because you have no real choice" is hardly motivating, assholes!

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

Not a Dem. Just actually paid attention and don't want fools throwing us to the greater evil simply because they didn't get their way.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Anther fantasy about what was stated in an attempt to ignore it as you've no leg to stand upon.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The winner of the Primary being supported by the Party is how it is supposed to work

Agreed.

Unfortunately the party has that backwards, and a judge agreed with them.

The winner of the primary is whoever they want it to be. They can influence as much as they want, because at the end of a day it doesn't even matter who wins the primary. Legally a bunch of unelected donor connected people can name whoever they want.

But I don't think I want to get roped in a conversation with you based on your post history

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago

Legally a bunch of unelected donor connected people can name whoever they want.

i.e., The Big Club (NSFW - language)

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

False. While they may wield undue influence, there is nothing remotely "rigged" about it.

My post history is one of treating folks as they treat me. I understand why you don't wish to have a conversation as you've not a leg to stand on, but the only person that could possibly rope you into one is you.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

My post history is one of treating folks as they treat me.

that's a lie

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Fuck anyone who drags out the word "purity" in this conversation.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Ignore "whining" and just assume that Biden is a perfect being with no flaws, and you drive people away.

I will vote for Biden if I have to. That doesn't mean I have to accept him as a paragon of progressivism and support for the people. He is, at best a flawed man with flawed ideals. At median he's a symptom of stagnating politicians scared to lose power.

Refusing to acknowledge that and force him to better both himself and his party for the sake of the people just leads to more disillusionment and failure.

I will vote for him, but only because he's the only option I'm given. I will still push for him to support people and not a political narrative.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

Anther fantasy about what was stated in an attempt to ignore it as you've no leg to stand upon.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
374 points (97.7% liked)

News

36251 readers
862 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS