578
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Prosecutors will seek the death penalty for the white supremacist who killed 10 Black people at a Buffalo supermarket.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago

The death penalty is a barbaric institution. It always has been, and it always will be. The government says it’s okay to murder this person, so let’s murder him.

I don’t get why that doesn’t shock people’s consciences and sense of basic decency.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 86 points 10 months ago

I think it's that guys like this one aren't a hill anyone is eager to die on. Like, it's bad, but let's not make this guy the poster boy for ending the practice. There are other cases I'm much happier to cite in arguments opposing the death penalty.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 60 points 10 months ago

Perhaps one of the many innocent folks on death row, which includes a not insignificant amount of African Americans too.

But this guy can fuck right off, I am not losing a second of sleep to his suffering.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I am never worried about guilty people on death row. I am worried about those that kill them, those that help kill them, those that witness the killing, and those who believe falsely that this form of justice will heal anyone from harms or prevent future harms.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

You forgot to worry about those who are raised in a society where it's okay to kill people for any reason other than preventing another person from being harmed.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Even a single innocent person getting murdered by the state makes the practice barbaric. The state is imperfect. It should not have a license to murder.

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago

We're all in agreement, but as OP said, this
particular person isn't the time to make your stand on. We've all been vocally against the death penalty for a long time, but this specific person is not the one to make an especially strong "this is the line, no further" kind of stand for. I'm against him being killed like I'm against all cases of the government killing prisoners, but I'm also not doing any extra standing up for this particular person.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

So you only stand by your views as long as it's convenient and easy?

I guess the right of attorneys is important but if the state violates his rights to that in this trial then you are not gonna have an issue with that either?

[-] ickplant@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

He is standing by his views. Just not going out of his way to defend this person. Let’s see you go to the courtroom and protest this particular guy’s death penalty if you are so dedicated.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

If I lived there, I would. Not protesting this shows that you're actually okay with the death penalty, and your typical admonishment of it doesn't reflect your true beliefs.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Maybe alienating your allies is why the death penalty still exists

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

who's upvoting this coward bullshit?

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago

People that understand strategy. Rosa Parks wasn't the first person to be arrested for violating the seat law, but she was unimpeachable as a person and made an effective figurehead.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago

this particular person isn't the time to make your stand on.

Those of us who are vehemently against the death penalty tend to be vocal about it every time it comes up, not just when it's happening to awful people. It's important to make it clear that even in cases like this, the death penalty should not be a thing, because otherwise we tacitly agree that sometimes, the death penalty is a good thing.

This particular person is absolutely the time to make our stand against the death penalty, because if we don't, then we don't stand against it at all.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

Do you want judge Dredd instead?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I have a friend who went to protest outside the federal prison when Timothy McVeigh was executed. He had no love for McVeigh. He thought McVeigh was a monster. That wasn't the point. The point was that capital punishment is always wrong. The state should not have the power of life and death over its citizenry.

And I have great respect for him for doing so. Protesting capital punishment in cases like this are just as important as in lesser cases because the reason for the punishment isn't at issue.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

I’ll be glad when death penalty is abolished. But we’ve still got time till then, and this guy live streaming himself doing the murders doesn’t leave much in the way of wiggle room for innocence.

Gonna be tragic when we learn it was secretly racist nano robots controlling his whole body by time traveling confederates.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Probably because our morals and principles collapse at the first speed bump.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Too busy getting our consciousnesses shocked by mass killings at supermarkets, I guess. By the way, nice work blinding that cyclops.

load more comments (27 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
578 points (98.3% liked)

News

23413 readers
1535 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS