299
submitted 10 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Iran can't take Israel, Israel has nukes.

The question is, can Israel broker peace? With all these American weapons and cash, they have no interest in brokering peace, but without that support, maybe their incentives will change.

We could pull that support tomorrow, they'll be fine. I have 0 concerns.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If US support for Israel doesn't concern Iran, why would Israel's incentive change without it?

The US and our allies try to keep Iran contained not just for Israel but for the world. Look, the Jews are in Israel. Iran will never accept it, not in our lifetimes. They will weirdly, very proudly die trying if they get the chance. Such a war will kill tens of millions of people, displace tens of millions more, and lead to a cascade of failed states.

I believe it's a question of when Iran attacks Israel not if. I mean, they already have. The tunnels in Gaza were built with Iranian money. The 3,000 thermobaric rockets Hamas launched at Israel on October 7 came from Iran.

America's strong military alliance with Israel is arguably the most significant part of western strategy in the middle east, the thing that keeps Iran from going frog.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If US support for Israel doesn't concern Iran, why would Israel's incentive change without it?

Of course it concerns Iran. Why would you assume otherwise? And Israel's incentives would change because without the support they can't really hold up against Iran militarily, so diplomacy becomes a better option.

They will weirdly, very proudly die trying if they get the chance. Such a war will kill tens of millions of people, displace tens of millions more, and lead to a cascade of failed states.

Meh, scare mongering. Also, your numbers are probably way off, Israel only has a population of 9 mil, I can't really see tens of millions of deaths and also tens of millions displaced. The region is just not that big.

America's strong military alliance with Israel is arguably the most significant part of western strategy in the middle east, the thing that keeps Iran from going frog.

America's military alliance is a sneaky, immoral way to keep a small hot war going for a century so we always have a testing ground for new weapons. That's why America continues to support Israel. I want no part in it and it haunts me that so many of my tax dollars go into funding this cruelty, making me responsible.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Iran has a population of 100,000,000 and Israel will turn it into a parking lot of given half a chance.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

That's fair, but it would also show their true intentions and turn the world against them. As seen with Russia, the world doesn't like it when you commit atrocities, and they'll band together to make it more difficult for you. As a result, I don't see them actually using nukes on Iran. Nukes have always been a better deterrent than a weapon.

I expect that they would keep Iran at bay by doubling down on their rhetoric to get the most out of their nuclear deterrent (just like Russia has). But being the smaller nation (by a lot) and also being generally outnumbered in the region by Islam, I don't see them invading Iran, the odds would be impossibly against them.

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
299 points (96.9% liked)

News

23376 readers
2943 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS