554
Haier hits Home Assistant plugin dev with takedown notice
(www.bleepingcomputer.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
554 points (99.1% liked)
Selfhosted
39677 readers
154 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yes they do have to fund their defense to begin with, however there has to be some balance struck. Until the court proceedings are concluded it isn't known which side is in the right.
I think most countries' public funding for legal representation is limited to criminal matters, and even then you have to qualify (eg have a very low income or be unemployed). With civil matters, it's up to you to find a lawyer you can afford, or one who will take it on pro bono.
If the defendent is obviously in the right, then it should be more likely that they can find a lawyer who will work pro bono.
vs
Before the trial happens, it could really go either way, even if the defendant is obviously in the right - there could be some procedural slip up that causes them to lose anyway.
However, a lawyer isn't going to assume that they will make some slip up, so if it is obviously in the defendant's favour they will work pro bono. There is still some risk for them, because if they lose they don't get paid, but they're confident they'll win.
Edit: wrote the reply thinking this was a conversation about awarding costs to the defendant, that was a different thread. The first paragraph remains unchanged though.
I wish Lemmy showed you more of the context than just the last reply.
You can keep pressing on "Show context" to load more replies, up until the top level one.
Yeah I know, however when you reply to someone from a notification you just want to reply.
Also, when you move up the context on a Lemmy thread you see each comment and all its other comments. If the comment chain you're replying on isn't the top thread, then you get cluttered up with all the others. On reddit, context meant you only saw the comments that directly lead to the comment you were deriving context from. Furthermore, context was derived from the comment URL with a
?context=3suffix, so you could easily specify how far up the chain you wanted to go.Lemmy does context differently, but I prefer reddit's method.