175
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Magician@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

I don't get how libs can tolerate being taken for granted like this. They're not being mature or practical - they're accepting mistreatment by an establishment sworn to serve them.

Trump and his supporters aren't better, but at least he's telling them what they want to hear. He at least made sure to get checks out to people and had his signature stamped on them.

I dunno, at least there's a strategy there. And Biden has had four fucking years and he's done nothing to get people motivated to vote or even register to vote. Not even going into his participation in genocide, it's just a lack of strategy to the point of self-sabotage.

And the entire Democratic party is complicit in all of it. It's like they want to lose, because all I'm hearing are about how bad trump is/was. And it's like, I was fucking there. And after three years, all they can offer is to give him a verbal reprimand and coverage on every major news network, speech, and social media posting.

It's just mind-blowing to think of the wasted time and energy on the part of the US political system.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 18 points 10 months ago

I dunno, at least there’s a strategy there. And Biden has had four fucking years and he’s done nothing to get people motivated to vote or even register to vote. Not even going into his participation in genocide, it’s just a lack of strategy to the point of self-sabotage.

This is the basic gripe of Democrats the country over. The Democratic party absolutely sucks at between-election messaging. All of the great messaging campaigns that kept them relevant and positively viewed were all basically reactions to Republican fucks up. I mean, the House Freedom Caucus is actively trying to hand Democrats some good PR with their bullshit budget requests. Senate Republicans know it can come back to screw those up for reelection, too.

And what are the Democrats doing? Nothing? Releasing websites about abortion rights or some shit? Idk. The Democratic is really bad at the communications part of politics.

[-] someone@hexbear.net 53 points 10 months ago

This is the basic gripe of Democrats the country over. The Democratic party absolutely sucks at between-election messaging.

I thought the problem was their between-election inability to actually do anything.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Whenever any political commentator opines about the DNC’s problem being poor messaging I just immediately tune out. This is what comms and marketing people push to encourage democrats to dump even more money into advertising and PR. The problem is not insufficient PR lmao, it’s the rot, corruption and evil anti-worker policies of the party in governance that are the problem

I thought we were supposed to be communists here. Are we really repeating DNC narratives about the problem being insufficient money into consultants? This is MSNBC quality political commentary

[-] viva_la_juche@hexbear.net 40 points 10 months ago

Probably would have a lot more to communicate if they did actually do anything shrug-outta-hecks

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago

Depending on the level of government we're talking about, that's true or they do a lot and just never talk about it like idiots.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 41 points 10 months ago

Not a single American politician is doing anything good. Everything is getting worse and they’re all bourgeois monsters top to bottom, both parties. Even “the squad” types are passing bills to fund Israel’s genocide and warmongering

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Even “the squad” types are passing bills to fund Israel’s genocide and warmongering

Prove it. I'm curious as to where you've come to believe The Squad is funding Israel's genocide and warmongering. As far as I'm aware, that is not true. So, I'm really looking forward to be disabused of my rosy view of them.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 46 points 10 months ago

Where do you libs come from? AOC supported the fucking coup in Bolivia of course she supports Israel and condemns Hamas.

https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-rep-ocasio-cortez-violence-israel-and-palestine

Omar, Tlaib, all of them repeat anti-Russia propaganda and push for more funding for Ukraine. They are all warmonger class traitors

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

The issue is the Squad funding Israel's genocide and warmongering. We can take up the issue of Bolivia some other time if you're still around.

The press release condemns Hamas for the October 7th attack. That's reasonable to most except those that sanction political violence as if it ever works the way we think it does. I mean, Hamas killed 1200 Israelis on that day, believing political violence was justified...and look at Gaza now...but I digress....

This press release says

“It’s welcome news that Representatives Ocasio-Cortez, Pocan, and McCollum, along with dozens of their House colleagues, are urging the Biden Administration to establish an immediate bilateral ceasefire in Israel-Palestine and asking for greater humanitarian access in all parts of Gaza,” said Hassan El-Tayyab, legislative director for Middle East policy at FCNL.

That's definitely not active support of Israeli genocide or warmongering.

Moreover, Biden is having to bypass Congress altogether to get Israel aid. That takes any culpability away from the Squad imho since they clearly oppose giving more money to Israel.

So, again, the issue is the Squad funding Israel's genocide and warmongering. Do you have any other evidence that they're doing that?

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 37 points 10 months ago

those that sanction political violence as if it ever works the way we think it does

Except for every successful revolution. The October Revolution, Chinese Revolution, Cuban Revolutuon, Vietnam as examples.

The press release condemns Hamas for the October 7th attack. That's reasonable

That's not reasonable to us here because we're communists. Condemning Hamas is wrong. I'm not suprised the Squad has taken that position because they're a bunch of libs

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

That’s not reasonable to us here because we’re communists. Condemning Hamas is wrong. I’m not suprised the Squad has taken that position because they’re a bunch of libs

...this is definitely off the topic originally discussed, I'm curious:

It's not enough for you that they actively oppose Israeli genocide; rather, they have to also support Hamas in their struggle against Israel?

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 30 points 10 months ago

It's not enough for you that they actively oppose Israeli genocide; rather, they have to also support Hamas in their struggle against Israel?

Centrism is support of the status quo. Nominally opposing Israel and Hamas is opposing change to the current trajectory and nothing better. Hamas represents the most viable current expression of the political will of Palestinians, hence its broad support by them, so any reasonable anti-imperialist will support them until such a time comes as they are no longer the most viable or they no longer have a war that it is productive for them to fight (i.e. once Palestine is freed from river to sea).

[-] robinn_IV@hexbear.net 28 points 10 months ago

It's not enough for you that they actively oppose Israeli genocide; rather, they have to also support Hamas in their struggle against Israel?

Yes.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 28 points 10 months ago

they

I don't care about the Squad. I don't support them or any US politician and no one else here does either. So its not a question of me thinking what they are doing is enough or not.

Leaving them out of it. We support the Palestinian struggle. We supported it when the PLO was the main force, and we support it now that Hamas is. The violence of the oppressed can never be equated to the violence of the opressor. Condemning Hamas is against the Palestinian struggle

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 21 points 10 months ago

Hamas are the only people fighting Israel (in addition to Hezbollah, Yemen, Iraqi resistance, Syria and Iran). These are the only people doing anything about the genocide, yes you have to support them if you don’t support genocide. Literally everyone else on earth is standing by watching doing nothing

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

aren't they in alliance with local communist and anarchist groups who supported the 7/10 attacks and continue to fight? not taking away from your point - just adding to the groups of involved resistance fighters.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

Yes I should have said the axis of resistance are the ones fighting (which includes other Palestinian groups in addition to Hamas)

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 33 points 10 months ago

The press release condemns Hamas for the October 7th attack. That's reasonable to most except those that sanction political violence as if it ever works the way we think it does.

What options did they have other than armed resistance, they already tried peaceful protest and got their kneecaps obliterated by snipers

I mean, Hamas killed 1200 Israelis on that day, believing political violence was justified...and look at Gaza now...but I digress....

The IOF killed most of those people on Oct 7 but don't let the facts get in the way of propaganda blaming the victims

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Oof. Almost got baited there. Touché.

I think it's clear that the Squad isn't funding Israel's genocide and warmongering and staunchly stands opposed to it.

[-] robinn_IV@hexbear.net 30 points 10 months ago

I could condemn slavery and oppose all violent resistance against it. My condemnation would not be worth two grains of salt.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 26 points 10 months ago

Who cares about the Squad. The Squad are a bunch of useless libs

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 32 points 10 months ago

That's reasonable to most except those that sanction political violence as if it ever works the way we think it does.

Look, I hate the American Revolutionary War as much as the next guy, but I don't think this is an accurate characterization

Oh, sorry, you were probably thinking of something more like the Haitian Revolution. I wonder what the differences is thonk us-foreign-policy

[-] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hamas killed 1200 Israelis on that day

You are using Palestine's resistance of occupation and ethnic cleansing to justify their occupation and ethnic cleansing.

Nothing Hamas or anyone does can change the fact that they are justified in resisting Israel's occupation and ethnic cleansing.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Y'all keep jumping down my throat for something I never said. Similarly, y'all hate on The Squad for a position they don't hold either.

[-] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why would you bring up the number of dead settlers/soldiers on Oct 7 if not to justify The Squad's opposition to Hamas?

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

The attack is the only thing they've condemned, since they're opposed to violence. They've also opposed Israel and maintained support for Palestine because they're opposed to violence.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 30 points 10 months ago

You're equating the violence of the oppressed with the violence of the oppressor, which is not equivalent. Opposing Isreal and Hamas is just supporting the status quo, which is genocide

[-] robinn_IV@hexbear.net 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean, Hamas killed 1200 Israelis on that day, believing political violence was justified...and look at Gaza now...but I digress....

Haaretz: “According to [comments by Tuval Escapa, the kibbutz’s security coordinator], only on Monday night and only after the commanders in the field made difficult decisions—including shelling houses on their occupants in order to eliminate the terrorists without knowing whether the Israelis in those buildings were alive or dead—the IDF completed the takeover of the kibbutz.”

An air force colonel said that Israeli airstrikes may have intentionally killed Israeli captives rather than let them be taken to Gaza. Speaking in Hebrew about the airstrikes, Colonel Nof Erez told a Haaretz podcast in November that “the Hannibal Directive was apparently applied” and that 7 October “was a mass Hannibal.”

Ynet (Israeli government affiliated): Israel fired from helicopters into crowd of festival goers indiscriminately (blamed on “Hamas deception”)

Regardless, let’s look at the nonviolent approach. Have you heard of the Great Match of Return? Palestinians would be condemned to a slow death if they did not resist. Take your liberal condemnation of violence and shove it.

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 21 points 10 months ago

Biden doesn't have to bypass Congress to get Israel aid. Who would vote against it? The evangelical cultists of the republican party would do anything to bring about their apocalyptic vision of the second coming and no democrat would vote against it. They're bypassing congress so they don't have to inform the world what they're sending to arm the genocide machine.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

They’re bypassing congress so they don’t have to inform the world what they’re sending to arm the genocide machine.

Biden's bypassing Congress was reported by national media outlets. If what you say is true, then it was probably the most ineffective way to do anything inconspicuous .

There's probably another explanation that you're dismissing out of hand

Biden doesn’t have to bypass Congress to get Israel aid. Who would vote against it?

I bet there are people that would vote against it and that's why Biden bypassed Congress. Until that legislation comes up though, we're kinda at an impasse empirically.

[-] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I didn't say "inform the world that they're sending," I said "inform the world what they're sending." Bypassing congress with the national security bullshit means they don't have to say, "Yeah, we're giving them white phosphorous and cluster bombs to commit war crimes."

[-] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago

Hamas killed 1200 Israelis on that day, believing political violence was justified...and look at Gaza now...but I digress...

Damn, sucks that they couldn't get around to shooting you too! Maybe next time

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago

I mean, Hamas killed 1200 Israelis on that day, believing political violence was justified...

this is in dispute, with Hebrew language outlets reporting based on survivor accounts that it was the indiscriminate attacks by the IDF that led to so many deaths.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

Hey hey! Someone with evidence!

The Grayzone seems suspect as hell, but some of the links to which it leads are high quality.

I think this is worth considering in the future...thanks.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 19 points 10 months ago

their sources are all clearly laid out. they're an anti-imperialist, leftist magazine but that means they have to be heavily cited because they're opposing the state department narrative and don't get the benefit of the doubt. I think in time you'll find in time that their reporting is generally pretty accurate.

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 26 points 10 months ago

And the national level Democrats failing to pass things during the years they have total control while doing things like liberalism makes it harder to trust the local ones.

Like most of the Dems running in my state with the party backing are all getting money from the realtors' association and the power company...

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

all getting money from the realtors' association and the power company...

That's every local government in every town and city in the US, totally regardless of party.

[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 41 points 10 months ago

it is in the material interest of the democratic party to not wield power

[-] jabrd@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago

People hear this and balk because they picture the “leadership” of the party that requires popular support to maintain office, but what’s really meant is the massive funding base/NGO apparatus/professional politickers ie lanyard-dicks that all get more money and more support when the GOP is in office acting like lunatics. The consultant class gets a new boat every time Trump says something racist in office. Remember that law office that ate up all of Stacy Abrams cash meant to fIgHt FoR vOtInG rIgHtS?

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 17 points 10 months ago

100-com the only thing the Biden admin/dems did about Roe being overturned was fundraise. Its a business. Its the most important election ever, because they want it hyped for the billions it brings in. None of them care

[-] jabrd@hexbear.net 24 points 10 months ago

If the Dems wanted to win they wouldn’t be running Joe, simple as

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
175 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13546 readers
963 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS