369
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The craze for Stanley stainless steel drinking cups reached new levels last week when a woman was arrested and accused of stealing 65 of them, worth almost $2,500, from a store in California.

Police in Roseville, in Placer County, northeast of Sacramento, said Sunday that they were called Wednesday to a report of a theft from a store on Stanford Ranch Road in the city.

"Staff saw a woman take a shopping cart full of Stanley water bottles without paying for them. The suspect refused to stop for staff and stuffed her car with the stolen merchandise," police said in a statement on Facebook.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Crime aside, if I ever spend $45 on a water bottle, you all have permission to kill me.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Its a pretty good thing to spend money on if you use it on a daily basis. I work in a kitchen and need an insulated water bottle or I will literally die. Instead of using plastic I use a reusable bottle. I bought it a year ago and I have not looked back. Yeah, its more expensive than it needs to be and is a fad, but it's certainly not the most irresponsible thing you can spend $50 on. edit: removed superfluous an

[-] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 months ago

I mean... It's a lot of metal... And it's strong enough to survive the job site for a decade.

As someone who frequents construction sites for my job, and also as someone who has owned a Stanley travel mug and water bottle before whatever the fuck this fad is ( over 10 years... ), they are nigh indestructible, and they keep temperature for longer than either my wife's Hydro flask or my yeti. So far in that sams period only my, Yeti coffee mug has survived as long. My wife has replaced her hyroflasj twice.

Just anecdotal, but I tend to be hard on things, and it's stayed with me this long... It's like $4/year for a coffee mug.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Sure, but there are re-usable metal insulated bottles that are a lot less than $45 and will also last for years. This is $45 because it's trendy.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, cant deny that. Relative to no bottle, it's better. Relative to other bottles, it's bad. A middle ground would be nice. Id like to think that maybe the fad-aspect of it will increase the amount of water bottle users over all, but I'm very pessimistic about that. edit: spelling

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I've been reusing my liter bottle of aquafina for months now. Just buy a regular fuckin bottle and reuse it.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Those leach microplastic into your water. Don't reuse them. Although any $1 water bottle is probably safe.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Honestly the research shows microplastics are already everywhere so I'm not really worried about that

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Car exhaust is everywhere. Do you huff directly from the tailpipe?

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The main difference is microplastics are literally everywhere.

Bought a plastic wrapped sandwich? Microplastics. Drank from a plastic cup? Microplastics. Ate something that was prepared in a factory with plastic packaging? Microplastics.

Even things that don't look like plastics like fast food foil wrappers are still full of microplastics.

Idgaf anymore.

[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You missed a really big one of: did you wear clothing the has synthetic fibers? Bam! (Emeril voice) micro plastics.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I spent like $20 on two off brand metal ones and have used them for years now. Metal is easier to recycle and doesn't contribute to micro plastics

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean it would probably just about last a lifetime. Stanley are good bottles. Do you go through water bottles fast somehow?

[-] neptune@dmv.social 12 points 10 months ago

You can lose a $20 water bottle as easily as a $45.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well that's not the water bottle's fault. If you're prone to losing things then yeah a lifetime purchase isn't for you. I don't buy nice sunglasses for that reason, lol.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

No, I don't go through water bottles fast, which is exactly why I wouldn't spend $45 on one.

[-] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Not quite that expensive but, my LTT Water bottle is super nice tbh, no regrets

[-] excitingburp@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

My regrets about my LTT bottle is that it's LTT. Still a functional bottle though.

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
369 points (96.2% liked)

News

23413 readers
1580 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS