13
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT Linux Performance Review
(www.phoronix.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
8551 readers
784 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is the best summary I could come up with:
AMD announced back during CES the Radeon RX 7600 XT as a $329 USD graphics card for 1080p/1440p gaming.
It shouldn't be surprising given AMD's trajectory in the Radeon open-source GPU support over recent years and the maturity of the rest of the RDNA3 GPU line-up, but there is fully open-source and upstream support for the Radeon RX 7600 XT for launch day.
On the likes of Ubuntu 23.10 and Fedora Workstation 39 with software updates is out-of-the-box support for the Radeon RX 7600 XT 16GB graphics card.
For those curious, and since it's been a while since having my hands on an XFX graphics card, XFX does list "Linux" support on the product packaging for this Radeon RX 7600 XT... Then again it's been fairly common to see across AMD's AIB partners but always fun seeing Linux mentions.
As is usually the case, the newer Linux kernel and Mesa you feel comfortable running, typically the better performance and features.
Via the standard Radeon Software for Linux packaged drivers is going to be the RX 7600 XT support if unable/unwilling to upgrade your kernel or Mesa manually.
The original article contains 536 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!