411
submitted 2 years ago by jherazob@beehaw.org to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

This blog post by Ploum, who was part of the original XMPP efforts long ago, describes how Google killed one great federated service, which shows why the Fediverse must not give Meta the chance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Spzi@lemmy.click 15 points 2 years ago

if Google or Meta wants to join they should to us not us to them so if they break federation we should not care and continue implement our stuff

As I understood the article, the danger is that large actors like these are too important too ignore. Too many users, too much content to neglect. So while in theory you are obviously right, in reality there will be a temptation to cater to their needs, because it seems so worthwhile.

[-] da_g@feddit.it -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Form the hate I see here towards them I don't think anyone would do that, just my opinion tho. I think we would only benefit from it.

[-] z3k3lon@lemmy.pt 7 points 2 years ago

They would enter the arena, set their own rules and kick out everyone not complying for sure.

[-] da_g@feddit.it -1 points 2 years ago

How? The fediverse is our. If we don't comply the maximum they could do is defederalize and then we have the same old fediverse, thay can not kick us out of what is ours, we have the power here

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
411 points (98.1% liked)

Fediverse

17852 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS