446
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Stand for America Fund Inc, a super PAC that supports Nikki Haley, reported on Thursday that it has raised $50.1 million in the second half of 2023 — millions more than Trump-aligned super PAC MAGA Inc., which reported over $46 million.

There are no details from these numbers yet, which were reported by the New York Times, as the Federal Election Commission filing deadline is only Jan. 31.

When it comes to MAGA Inc.'s funds, the super PAC ended the year with over $23 million in cash on hand, according to reports — and counted with over a dozen donors who contributed with $1 million or more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 119 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Best case scenario is she wins the nomination.
Everyone keeps saying that "Biden's best chance is against Trump".
And while that may be technically true, something people fail to take into account is that under absolutely no circumstances is Trump going quietly.
There's a 0% chance he doesn't run as an independent or write in candidate and split the Republican vote. It's just not going to happen.
And yes, the Republican party could just hand him the nomination and put him up if Nikki wins legitimately, but then they've just disenfranchised everyone that voted for her, everyone that wanted to vote Republican but didn't want to vote for Trump.
And some of those people will vote for Biden, and some may not vote at all.
But as much of a piece of shit as she is, the mess she's making in the Republican party is doing us all a huge favor.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Trump could die tomorrow and he would still get a non-trivial number of votes. Diehard MAGA would be talking about how he's not really dead, that he never stopped being president, and that Trump's hair looks amazing.

[-] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

I'll be willing to bet actual Dollarbucks that he gets write in votes ~10 years or 3 elections after he dies.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Most of his voters will be dead by then

[-] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Never underestimate the impact of generational stupidity

[-] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

There were "elvis sightings" in the tabloids well into the 90's.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

What are they gonna do, believe "Big Coroner." The same folks that lied to us about COVID deaths! /S if that wasn't obvious.

[-] CurbsTickle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I would join Twitter specifically to say things like that.

And I loathe Twitter.

[-] Pohl@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

I agree.

Even barring 3rd party shenanigans leaving dems in control of the WH. Haley will leave when her term is done, trump will not. I’d much rather take my chances on a less than favorable Haley-Biden matchup than make a wild, all-in bet for the future of the republic.

There is nothing about Haley that appeals to me but I hope she manages to pull this off somehow. I will sleep better, that’s for damn sure.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

There is nothing about Haley that appeals to me but I hope she manages to pull this off somehow. I will sleep better, that’s for damn sure.

Agreed. I even thought about requesting a Republican ballot this year for the Ohio primary and voting for her.
I'm voting for Biden in the general either way, but I'd still rather have him up against her.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm sorry, but I think this whole thread is crazy, Haley could absolutely beat Biden if she somehow managed to get the Republican nomination. Independents will vote against Trump in November because his handling of COVID and January 6 freaked them out, but they don't like Biden at all either and would love to have someone else to vote for. Plus, Haley being a woman will probably go a long ways towards disarming the abortion issue for people who only think about politics for five minutes a year.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I agree with you. Hayley worries me more and I think any Republican candidate will put project 2025 into action. I think Hayley will disarm a lot of worries specifically because she's not Trump, female, and people will vote for her partly to have the first female president. If she ends up being the nominee, the new nonsense against Biden will be about him being sexist which at least some people will fall for.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

I had the same thought. The reality is that most of America now identifies as Independent,

However, since 2009, independent identification has grown and reached levels not seen before. Now, political independents (41%) greatly outnumber Republican (28%) and Democratic (28%) identifiers. source

Haley absolutely massacred Trump in the New Hampshire primaries in regards to independents,

Strong turnout by unaffiliated voters and a comparative abundance of moderates stood out in exit poll results, underscoring the state's often unconventional voter profile. Forty-six percent reported being registered as "undeclared" rather than Republican vs. a previous record of 45% in 2012. Haley won those undeclared voters by a wide margin, 65-34%. source

I'm way more worried about a Haley run than another Biden vs Trump square-off. Everyone's already made the great points on all the other views with age, gender, and it still being the republican party in control but people would be tricked with the optics.

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Even though I disagree with Haley’s platform, I believe she’d leave office at the end of her term. I believe she’d accept the result of an election she’s lost. I believe that she’d behave with a level of decorum appropriate for the office.

So she’s immediately better than Trump simply by not being a fascist monster. Even if the dems lost to her, I wouldn’t have to worry about democracy suddenly ending or concentration camps for immigrants or nuking random countries and leaving NATO or her encouraging everyone to inject bleach and take horse de-worming pills, at least for 4 years.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 19 points 9 months ago

It's sad that "will behave with decorum and tact" is the bar Republicans continue to struggle to clear.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

She wouldn't nuke anyone, she'd just turn the country into Handmaiden's Tale.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

If trump runs as an independent and splits the vote up, and no one ends up getting 270 electoral votes, then the house of representatives gets to choose who to make president by simple majority of 26 out of 50(one vote per state). This currently means that Republicans get to pick, since they control more states.

So basically, if Biden can't hit 270 for any reason at all, Biden loses, and even if Nikki got 80 percent of all the other non Biden votes, the Republicans controlled house could choose to put trump back in, leaving us with a president that we'll over most of America didn't vote for.

Nikki and Trump together only need half the electoral votes, with Biden getting the entire other half, and that will leave a Trump or Nikki win.

[-] sygnius@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

leaving us with a president that we'll over most of America didn't vote for.

Keep in mind that in the last 30-something years, Republicans have only won the popular vote once for the Presidency, and that was back in 2004.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, the popular vote also used to always be the same as the electoral college vote. Since that stopped happening with the 2000 election, a republican (W Bush) has only won it once--in '04, as you say.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

leaving us with a president that we’ll over most of America didn’t vote for.

What else is new?

[-] neptune@dmv.social 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah in a vacuum are people maybe tired of Biden and dumb enough to gamble everything on a "change"? Sure. But Trump definitely has the crazies, the core, and other people who stayed at home in 2012 firmly in his grasp. He's not going to just tell Uncle Crazy to get in line and vote for Haley.

Conventional wisdom is that young Haley could beat and old and not popular incumbent, but it's banking on a bunch of Bush era realities, including Trump following norms.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Saint Nikk(y)? 🎅

[-] aniki@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

Should we be donating to her campaign? Would that money travel further in making sure neither of them win vs. donating to Biden?

Im not going to give either a penny but I am curious what others think.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
446 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
2191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS