32
submitted 8 months ago by CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

What in the fuck is actually going on? Serious question, I get there's war happening in Ukraine, but that doesn't remotely look like spilling over or even realistically taking all of Ukraine. Militaries are talking about increasing in size, Sweden were talking about citizens being prepared for war - is there some indication of a large scale land war coming that I'm missing?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 8 months ago

russia chose ukraine specifically because they got away with it before. you think theyre just going to stop if we 'let them have' part of ukraine?

russia has failed at whatever it was attempting, and is now dragging it out long enough to be a problem for NATO.

NATO is responding.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

No, absolutely I don't think they should let them have any of it, I'm not sure how that could be read into my comment.

Equally NATO have in no way indicated they have any plans of setting foot in Ukraine and outright said they won't. None of which explains why senior military leaders in the UK are saying they need to be able to raise an armed force double what they have at the minute, why nukes are being stationed in the UK or why Sweden are foreseeing land war in Europe.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 8 months ago

ha, ok. NATO members are preparing for some unknown possible escalation.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

Well that's kind of what I'm asking, is there something obvious I'm missing? Russia don't look capable of escalating, they're not even making inroads into Ukraine. A couple of squadrons of F35s would make a significant dent in Russian progress in Ukraine, but no-one even seems super keen to send F16s.

I'm genuinely curious what scenario they're currently seeing where a few hundred thousand troops are going to be necessary soon?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

i bet theres a metric fucktonne of info only handful of world leaders on in on. if i had to guess, russia is prolly internally throwing ideas of doing something stupid.

for reasons, well... it could be the f16s already in use are having an effect, and russia is about to respond hard core with air control... it could be that russia is frustrated and now willing to use small scale, 'local nukes' to shock ukraine.

maybe ukraine is starting to take the fight over the border, and that is spooking russia

a lot of these things lead to the war bleeding outside of ukraine, and stepping directly into nato territory on all sides.

[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I've been wondering the same, and my conclusion is rather alarming: a new axis of evil has formed between Iran, Russia, and North Korea. Russia shat the bed, so Iran is increasingly taking the lead. The troubles off the coast of Yemen are a product of that. China is the wild card here, but they certainly want to make a play for Taiwan and are just waiting for the right time... so, yeah, we seem to be heading for another global conflict. I hope I'm wrong.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

News

23177 readers
3299 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS