63
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by someguy3@lemmy.world to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

Continuing to increase the world population is absolutely nuts.

*I'm not interested in gradual natural declines from whatever factors. 2 max implemented now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 72 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hard disagree - you're effectively controlling people's body autonomy the same way as abortion bans. Let alone the confusion of differently structured families (what if the woman has two and a new husband wants one??).

Controlling wastefulness, development for the future and education on the other hand- absolutely. Side effect is that better education usually leads to smaller families, and that's before you also include sex ed and access to contraception.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Agreed. OP is choosing the stick over the carrot. The truth is that increasing education has a direct negative correlation to birth rates, and has like a million bonus side effects too

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My primary question is when do the needs of the many vs the needs of the few kick in?

All for body autonomy, but let's say in the future, we do have food shortages and you know your future kids won't be able to eat, and let's say you know they will in fact starve - would you agree that it's wrong to bring another child into that future?

If so, when is the line drawn? We already say in society that abortion is the moral choice if we know the child is doomed to die because of incurable diseases, does the same thought apply if you know your child will die of starvation?

Now, let's say that's happening but you're the government. And just for this question let's say the government is actually moral and useful, and basically infallible. I know, will never happen and our government couldn't be farther from that, but just for the this here they are. As the government they see the problem and see that people having too many babies will cause most babies die of starvation. Is it formal for them to limit the rights of some people to not have more children if it means a larger amount of children will live?

If so, when is that line drawn?

Unfortunately government doesn't work that way and people are cruel and have bias and so it would never work because it would be implemented in some horrible dystopian way. But I wanted to show my line of thinking, that I'm not someone who wants to be horrible, but in a backwards way to me I think it's more compassionate

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

The best answer to that line is what society will accept.

I mean, we already have a way to decide where that line is - supply and demand. In a perfect world people would decide not to have kids because its not financially possible based on the price due to shortages - like you say though that wouldn't be the case.

With realistic considerations - your support from society ceases at two kids. If you want to have more no govt support.etc. That's a vote killer as for some reason the governments responsible when you can't feed your kids, but that's the best way forward imo.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
63 points (62.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6216 readers
24 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS