22
submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaeme@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Democracy is when a leader is allowed to facilitate genocide and then threaten his voterbase by saying his opponent is worse and will do the same thing.

Harm reduction candidate is the Blue MAGA.

[-] Uvine_Umbra@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But... It's demonstrably true that red MAGA will be worse soo... Got an actual alternative before November? No? Ok.

[-] jaeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Neither candidate will fundamentally change anything. The US has always been an unsustainable broken oligarchy based on robbing others.

This is just the consequences of such a system, a slow painful decline.

[-] Uvine_Umbra@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not arguing against that, just pointing out that like it or not, for now that's the one choice that we have, so concede loss today to fight tomorrow versus surrendering in which tomorrow will never come

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

The alternative to harm reduction is... harm increase? Democrats being terrible and Republicans being substantially worse are not mutually exclusive facts. The election is FPTP, lesser evil is always the only rational choice.

Absolutely do everything in your power to facilitate tasteful alternatives between elections, but on election day anything other than voting for the lesser evil is tacit approval of the greater evil. Yeah, it's a shitty hostage situation, but the alternative is "Fuck the hostages".

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
22 points (73.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8560 readers
255 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS