719
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So I don't get it.

One side of corporate mouth: Old people are too expensive and they don't obey. We need to fire them so we can hire cheap, malleable, young people.

Other side of corporate mouth: Old people must work until they physically collapse and die at their station. There is therefore no room to hire additional workforce from the younger generation.

The goal is to have an seeming excess of workers to drive salaries down and hire young people who don't know better and have fit boddies

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the correct answer

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
719 points (98.1% liked)

Antiwork

9218 readers
2 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS