212
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Real talk - How will not paying convince conservatives to be for student debt forgiveness? They’re the ones blocking loan forgiveness, and this is a demographic of people that does lean toward them, so why would they listen?

IMHO, showing up to vote is what would actually put the fear of god into these politicians. Not paying a loan will totally fuck up your ability to rent, get a credit card, get reasonable car insurance, and even get a job. Bad credit is no joke.

[-] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

It won’t, but I hope most of these people realize the only way it’ll change is consistently going to vote and keeping their family updated on what to vote on.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

you voted for the most liberal candidate you had available for presidency already.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

strikes* will put the fear of god into politicians, if we vote they will just give us all crappy options.

also the benefit of not paying off those loans is they are actually left with a bit more money.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

strikes* will put the fear of god into politicians,

Striking of matches, maybe.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah these people are only hurting themselves. The US isn't hurting for cash and sooner or later those loans you're avoiding turn into garnishments.

[-] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And they’re not eligible for bankruptcy relief either

Correction: You can but it’s hard. It’s a little easier under this administration though

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/17/politics/student-loan-debt-bankruptcy/index.html

[-] Cogency@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As far as I know indentured servitude is illegal in this country already, I'm pretty sure that's reason enough not to pay.

They are conscientious objectors in that sense and I'm cheering them on.

[-] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Except, if don’t pay they don’t even need to sue to get a default judgment and garnish your wages.

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/can-my-student-loan-creditor-garnish-my-wages.html

I checked and there is one change. It’s easier to discharge through bankruptcy (although not simple by any means) under the current administration although without congressional change it’s still an uphill battle there too.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/17/politics/student-loan-debt-bankruptcy/index.html

[-] Cogency@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I am applauding the act of resistence, I don't think the fact that garnishing wages is a consequence should dissuade those from trying to take a part in resisting. It doesn't make the debt culture we saddle our children with, for a chance at survival, any less immoral. Any resistence in such a culture is therefore a moral obligation.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

Not paying a loan will totally fuck up your ability to rent, get a credit card, get reasonable car insurance, and even get a job.

I don't agree to credit checks from landlords.

I have reasonable car insurance.

I don't agree to credit checks from employers.

I do have a credit card and I test it once a month on a small purchase, usually coffee.

Any other dire warnings you wish to inform me about that do not match the real world?

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Don’t match the real world? Just because you have been lucky to avoid that stuff doesn’t mean that a LOT of us haven’t experienced that stuff.

Credit checks are common in housing markets with limited supply, all the largest auto insurance companies in the US now do credit checks, and jobs in industries like finance and security often add a credit check during your pre-hire background check.

And god forbid you ever need some serious financial products like another loan. That is off the table.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I get the feeling that dude is in his 20s. Bless his heart.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, there aren’t a lot of Americans over 35 that don’t realize how hard a bad credit score can fuck you. There’s no shortage of very real horror stories around this stuff.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Must have somehow missed this repeatedly my entire life. Totally a real thing I am sure.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It depends on your age and where you live. You may have gotten into housing, an insurance policy, or your gig before this trend took off.

It’s now a big enough problem that a handful of states have started to draft and pass legislation that bans credit checks for insurance, housing, and employment. So, if you’re in a place like CA or MA, you might not notice that this is fair game in most of America.

That said, a lot of this fuckery is still super common and fair game in most of the US.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Housing: 6 years ago

Car insurance: I think about 3 maybe 2.

Job: 3.5 years ago

Do not live in CA or MA or a state that has rules like that. In fact 11 years ago a landlord did ask me and I said no. She backed down when I said I wasn't going to bend on the issue. Of all the places in my life this was the only one that asked.

But yeah you continue to worry

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
212 points (98.2% liked)

News

35800 readers
617 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS