368
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Boys and men from generation Z are more likely than older baby boomers to believe that feminism has done more harm than good, according to research that shows a “real risk of fractious division among this coming generation”.

On feminism, 16% of gen Z males felt it had done more harm than good. Among over-60s the figure was 13%.

The figures emerged from Ipsos polling for King’s College London’s Policy Institute and the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership. The research also found that 37% of men aged 16 to 29 consider “toxic masculinity” an unhelpful phrase, roughly double the number of young women who don’t like it.

“This is a new and unusual generational pattern,” said Prof Bobby Duffy, director of the Policy Institute. “Normally, it tends to be the case that younger generations are consistently more comfortable with emerging social norms, as they grew up with these as a natural part of their lives.”

Link to study: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/masculinity-and-womens-equality-study-finds-emerging-gender-divide-in-young-peoples-attitudes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 80 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Looks like this was an online poll where you get paid if randomly selected:

Ipsos UK interviewed online a representative sample of 3,716 adults aged 16+ across the United Kingdom between 17 and 23 August 2023. This data has been collected by Ipsos’s UK KnowledgePanel, an online random probability panel...

https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/masculinity-and-womens-equality-study-finds-emerging-gender-divide-in-young-peoples-attitudes

For what it's worth, there's a recent Gallup survey showing a similar trend that published a couple weeks ago:

...Since 2014, women between the ages of 18 and 29 have steadily become more liberal each year, while young men have not. Today, female Gen Zers are more likely than their male counterparts to vote, care more about political issues, and participate in social movements and protests.

https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-gender-gap-young-men-women-dont-agree-politics-2024-1

[-] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

That's an interesting thing to note. If the people more likely to approve of Tate and his message are the ones looking for easy money then that could indicate a degree of selection bias.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The existence and popularity of people like Tate and toxic dating strategy shit might be an indication of how Gen Z is handling misogyny. It's possible Gen Z hasn't been exposed to misogyny in such heavy doses as the rest of us. Seeing your peers undervalued and objectified could sort of be an inoculation. There also might be a perquisite strong belief in equality component.

For things like feminism, the battle is never over. Insidious ideals like misogyny needs to be constantly kept in check.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Your first link disagrees with the article you posted...

And while younger people overall have a more favourable view of this phrase, there is a big gender divide in views among them: 37% of men aged 16 to 29 say “toxic masculinity” is an unhelpful phrase, roughly double the 19% of young women who feel this way. Correspondingly, young women (47%) are considerably more likely than young men (29%) – or any other age category – to find it a helpful term.

By contrast, views among older age groups vary less by gender – although older men are more likely than younger men to say “toxic masculinity” is an unhelpful term.

It sounds like the only change is you get women are more supportive of feminism than older women...

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The first link is the study the article cites to. Also, I don't think there's a disagreement. The portion you cited refers specifically to "toxic masculinity," whereas the article focuses on people's reactions to "feminism." Specifically, it mentions that 16% of Gen Z males felt feminism had done more harm than good, compared to 13% among those over 60, to support its claim.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Looked at the pdf ...

The public think the oldest group of men are most likely to believe equal opportunities for women have gone too far – but it is actually men aged 30 to 59 men who are more likely to feel this way47% of the public think older men aged 60+ are most likely to believe attempts to give women equal opportunities have gone too far – the top answer given. But in reality, 20% of men aged 30 to 59 hold this view, compared with 13% of men aged 60+.

For 16-29, it's 5%

So yeah, still not sure why you're using a string of different articles, but they don't agree with you main post bud...

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not sure what you're arguing anymore. I said the article focuses on the "feminism" portion of the study. This new portion you cited to is about "equal opportunities." Look at page 15 of the PDF where it specifically shows 16% for men aged 16-29 vs. 13% for men aged 60+ with respect to "feminism" (the point of the article).

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Thank!

I saw the survey was just British respondents, but I didn't know that question was specifically about British culture...

Sorry, it's really hard to follow all the omissions and misrepresentations a survey went thru to get to the post you decided should be the main one.

But yeah, older people are going to remember what it was like 40 years ago and can see the good feminism has done.

A teenager would have know first hand knowledge how bad it was even a decade ago.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

No worries! Sorry if my tone sounded harsh. Yeah, I agree with you that new articles can sometimes have tunnel vision.

[-] xor@infosec.pub 0 points 7 months ago

and how many people will click on an ad or email saying you'll get paid to take a poll?
is that a representative portion of the population or a very niche subgroup of desperate, gullible or extremely bored people?
how/where was it advertised?
...
polls don't have to be bullshit, but they always are...

[-] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It sounds like you are sent the poll by snailmail and/or you are "recruited" that way and are then sent multiple polls over sometime.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/uk-knowledgepanel

It's hard to get random people's emails and still be sure that the samling is good. This way seems more reliable. The few serious polls I have ever been sent by the National Bureau of Statistics has always been sent by snailmail (or technically digital snailmail which is connected to my digital ID)

[-] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago

technically digital snailmail which is connected to my digital ID

do you mean e-mail? or is this some UK thing?

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, it's a free service you sign up for which delivers all the snailmail you get from governments and others to a digital mailbox instead. It's like instant snailmail.

It functions using an app or website instead of email, so you login by verifying your ID and not a password. I think the service is fairly common where I live.

You can also get some receipts via that service.

The service automatically organises all your mail into folders for each sender and separately for receipts and payments. Sender folders wouldn't work well for email because you get email for a lot of people and companies but with this service I have only collected 16 different senders over 3 years.

You can also share your digital mailbox with other people.

It's very convenient and saves time and paper. So I highly recommend checking if anything similar exists where you live.

I don't live in the UK so I don't know if they have anything like it.

[-] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago

so... they scan and digitize your mail for you?

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, they send it through the service. Nothing ever gets printed.

The different companies and government organisations do have to support it though.

There are a few different companies that deliver the same service, the biggest (and first?) one is apparently used by almost half of the country's population. Pretty much every service supports all the governmental organisations. Company support varies more.

One of the smaller (not small) service provider is owned by the goverment. I am thinking of switching to that one but I haven't bother yet.

Apparently at least one of the smaller providers supports scanning of all physical mail but I have never had that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

If you pay me to answer your poll, I'll answer it however you want me to.

[-] anytimesoon@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago
[-] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Good polling can be formated in a way to weed out people giving nonsense answers, it's like the first thing you learn about polling in sociology or psychology, how to extract quality data.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago

But they didn't tell you how they wanted you to answer, I guess...

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
368 points (92.6% liked)

News

22851 readers
3518 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS