Yes, I gave her the benefit of the doubt as well, but framing it as "we were the gatekeepers" and seeming annoyed that they have to be more transparent about their process is an... interesting way of presenting the argument.

I didn't find the full context for the video, but I don't think she was talking about the problem of misinformation. Even if they have credible sources that 99% of experts agree on and a transparent process, misinformation will still be spread (see climate change denial). So I think that's a different problem entirely.