337
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe to c/news@lemmy.world

The planet could see 2 degrees Celsius of warming by the end of the decade.

🤦🤦🤦

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 4 points 9 months ago

🤔 We all could put money together and go start some intentional communities out in Oregon or something.

Hell, we can look at the Amish to see what works and what doesn't.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 9 months ago

We all could put money together and go start some intentional communities out in Oregon or something.

This sort of thing was attempted many times in the 60s and 70s. They tended to devolve into the kind of petty authoritarianism you see in homeowners associations, then chaos, then nothing.

Hell, we can look at the Amish to see what works and what doesn't.

Religious fanaticism works for them.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 2 points 9 months ago

This sort of thing was attempted many times in the 60s and 70s. They tended to devolve into the kind of petty authoritarianism you see in homeowners associations, then chaos, then nothing.

So we need to build an economic model that allows people to truly be independent of one another, so we're not dependent on one another to survive anymore. 🤔 That could be doable with today's technology, certainly with near-future stuff

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

I highly recommend the documentary series All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace by Adam Curtis. He outlines connections between applications of computer technology, Rand's Objectivism, Alan Greenspan's influence on economics, and techno-utopian ideas, especially through the 70s, 80s and 90s. A lot of it is the groundwork for today's big tech companies and the current state of the economy. Episode 2 addresses the attempts at intentional communities directly.

So we need to build an economic model that allows people to truly be independent of one another, so we're not dependent on one another to survive anymore.

This is functionally impossible. We are all interdependent and the direction of technology development and international trade has made this ever more true. A great example is Thomas Thwaites' attempt to build a toaster from scratch (a relatively simple, inexpensive consumer product requires a very complex trade and manufacturing infrastructure to bring into existence).

And personally, I would argue that it is the wrong direction, and the wrong intention. Rather than trying to divest ourselves of interdependence, we should be acknowledging it and recognizing cooperation and mutual assistance as the true power of human society. We are all in this thing together.

Ultimately, you can't solve social problems with technology.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

People have done this but what I’m envisioning is something in more direct contact and dialogue with broader society. Rural ICs are cool but they are a bit isolated. Not to mention, most people live in cities and probably won’t want to move to the country. So I think this idea would work better as embedded in an urban area.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
337 points (99.4% liked)

News

23267 readers
3308 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS