326
submitted 9 months ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] muelltonne@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

In a better world roads would be closed for cars which exceed the capacity of those guard rails. Just put up a sign, do some enforcement and people will start buying smaller cars when they can't use them.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Vehicles that weigh more than 4 tons make up a significant amount of road traffic right now.
Literally everything you purchase in a store, your food, your toiletries, your clothes, any consumer good you have every purchased traveled on a road at some point in a vehicle that far exceeds 8 tons. Ambulances weigh more than 8 tons, fire trucks weigh more than 8 tons, mail is transported in vehicles that weigh more than 8 tons.
7,000lbs is an extremely low failure point for a guard rail given the number of vehicles that exceed that weight on the road today.

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Require a CDL for the big vehicles. Maintain stringent requirements for the CDL.

Do you still want that electric Ram?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

Commercial driver's license? I AM TRAVELLING AND NOT ENGAGED IN COMMERCE

[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

I DEMAND TO BE ABLE TO DRIVE MY 18 WHEELER WHEREVER I PLEASE, HEIGHT CLEARANCES ARE A DEEP STATE PLOT TO TAKE AWAY MY FREEDUMB

[-] 567PrimeMover@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

11'8" bridge cares not for your "freedoms"

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Oh, that brings back some memories of Reddit

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A good chunk of what's mentioned in GP already requires a CDL. That's not the issue.

I keep seeing "CDL" brought up as a magic solution, and it's clear people haven't looked into how it works and what it affects.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

It failing against a semi or a firetruck is kind of understandable but....yeah. Ambulances and then the 'smaller' every day vehicles? this shit is unacceptable

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

In an even better world, policies wouldn't be manipulative shitstains aimed at consumers and instead be regulation on those actually creating the thing that needs to change...

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

What would we do about semi trucks, delivery vans, busses, dump trucks, etc. etc. etc. Personally I've seen some pretty short busses but never a sport compact model.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

Pretty much all of those vehicles require a CDL.

Seems like vehicles over a certain weight requiring a special license classification is a pretty straightforward and reasonable requirement.

But we can't do it without simultaneously addressing mass transit, bikeped, and our general absolute psychological fixation around designing all of our society around cars first and people second.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

Actually, you only need a CDL if you're driving it commercially. I could walk out and buy a semi right now and drive it home. This is why you can rent Uhaul trucks and buy bus-sized RVs without a special license.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It varies somewhat by state, but that's generally incorrect.

Because the type of vehicle, and not the driver, defines who needs a CDL, the following characteristics have been set forth to define what a commercial motor vehicle is. A CDL is required of any driver of:

  1. Any vehicle designed to carry 16 or more persons including the driver, such as our campuses’ mini buses.
  2. Any vehicle that weighs over 26,000 pounds (defined as the greater of manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating, manufacturer’s gross combination weight rating, actual weight, or registered weight).
  3. Any vehicle that carries hazardous materials that require placarding as found in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 397.

These requirements include volunteers and temporary renters of such vehicles who are driving commercial motor vehicles on University business.

Uhaul intentionally goes right below the cutoff. Their largest truck is 26':

https://www.uhaul.com/Truck-Rentals/26ft-Moving-Truck/

Which has a GVWR of 25,999lbs. Very precise of them and totally real.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

I appreciate the correction

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago

I did not know that, but it unfortunately makes sense. You should always be absolutely terrified for your life when you see a uhaul for a reason.

God, it truly is "for non-commercial use only". I hear a chorus of sovcits cheering.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Actually pretty much none of them require a CDL unless you’re operating commercially.

You can go buy a school bus right now and drive it around without a cdl. Only needed to carry passengers.

You don’t need a CDL to be a delivery van driver either at all.

The current GVWR limit before you need a CDL is 26,000lbs. No light duty vehicle on the road comes close to that. Even the biggest Ram 4500 caps out at 16,500lbs GVWR. The Hummer EV caps out at 10,550lbs.

[-] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

There are already road signs that limit vehicle weight or restrictions for these vehicles anyway.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
326 points (94.1% liked)

News

23332 readers
1565 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS