225
submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago

Maybe don't use a private jet then?
It would be a lot harder to track someone on a random flight in business class. And I can't imagine business class is more expensive than flying private.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 31 points 9 months ago

With random peasants? Are you crazy? But then again, swift fans seems super nuts, so i wouldn't wanna meet them as well

[-] mlfh@lemmy.ml 23 points 9 months ago

It would be enormously easier to track Taylor Swift on a random flight in business class, because the moment people saw her on their random flight in business class it would turn into a social media frenzy.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

As a non American, I wouldn’t care actually. You guys need to chillax with your celebrity fetishisation

[-] whodatdair@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lol, you think only Americans worship celebrities? You need to travel more lol - shit is an issue everywhere, you ever seen a k-pop idol?

Some humans just fall for that shit for whatever reason.

[-] suction@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

yeah but Americans do that, too.

As an American, I can honestly say the only three times I've met a celebrity, once I didn't even recognize her (still don't remember her name, she had appearances on crime shows) , once I didn't care to acknowledge their presence (Kevin sorbo) , and once I literally just said "Hey do you and Alan Tudyk ever hang out since firefly? I love that show" to Nathan Fillion. Yes, they do things together sometimes.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone -1 points 9 months ago

Om not even American and have only spent a few months there, it even I've met more than 3 celebrities in America. That's an oddlyow number. I mean, just the other day in Sydney, Rachel Griffiths was in myocal café here in Sydney. I believe sheives locally, so it's not odd but celebrities are everywhere. She wants bothered by anyone. Taylor would be. I'm not a fan, but I can understand why she'd fly privately. I hope she offsets the emissions, but even the small effort she has done to improve youth voting would offset those emissions.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

3 months is more than enough to give you the virus of shit.

[-] suction@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Hey just because he ignored me and I had to follow him for weeks to get an answer, doesn't make me a stalker!

[-] turtlepower@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

So...a bunch of idiots end up on the no-fly list? I don't see a down side. I mean, I could see it being stressful for poor tay-tay, but nothing her money can't pay for in therapy.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Do you really think Taylor swift is just one person when she travels? And has two bags and a carry on?

I imagine the worlds biggest artist right now probably has enough crew and gear to fill an airplane by themselves.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Do you forget what community you're in?
It's insane to me that people in the CLIMATE community will bend over backwards to defend a celebrity with a fucking private jet.

Seriously though, will you also defend Elon musk and Jeff Bezos for their use of private jets too?
Or is it only ok when it's a "cool" celebrity?

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm just practical. If you go on a world tour where you have a day or so between gigs and you need to bring a lot of gear and people then it makes sense to use a private plane.

If she would fill the plane regardless then why not her own plane.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

If I want to invade a country, people will die. But that can't be helped, that's just the cost of things. What, you expect me not to invade a country? But I WANT to. That's how I make my money!! Surely that is the most important consideration.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
225 points (93.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5301 readers
422 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS