137
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 21 points 9 months ago

For those who missed it (or didn't watch) the AP has a pretty concise page with what happened.

https://apnews.com/live/trump-supreme-court-arguments-updates

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Good summary. Apparently even the Democratic judges are skeptical of upholding the Colorado Supreme Court decision.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

When faced with murky or complex legal issues surrounding elections, I think the court pretty much always tries to come down on the side of letting voters decide. And I'm not sure that's a bad philosophy. This has been my expectation from day one, though I've tried to keep an optimistic view and challenge myself to look for reasons they might rule differently.

I'm not surprised in the least, but I'm glad we at least the challenge was made. I'm not sure if any country can withstand self-sabotage by a nearly 50% party. If we can't defeat Trump at the ballot it doesn't really matter whether we can keep him off on a legal issue because there are still all those folks he has won over. Authority in our nation comes from the people, and the people decide. I just wish so many of us weren't so fucking stupid and hateful.

[-] mr_robot2938@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

“Let the voters decide” Just like in Bush v. Gore! Oh, wait…

[-] ira@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

And the 2nd Amendment!

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

The only hope America has is that Trump is convicted in one of his trials and receives jail time (hopefully a LOT of jail time). NAL but I'm pretty sure SCOTUS would back that scenario fully.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago

That would be wonderful. But it isn't the only hope. We can just defeat the fucker at the ballot box the old fashioned way. It isn't sexy and it doesn't stop conspiratorial thinking and it doesn't give the satisfaction of slapping him with consequences he has never faced in his life, but a mic drop is a mic drop. I would love to defeat him by an irrefutable margin. Might just be a pipe dream, though.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

not 'fully'. not this scotus.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They would probably stay his sentence pending presidency, at which point he would self pardon and go full dictator, dooming the country

The only hope for this country is either a senile genocide supporter winning in November, or a Big Mac induced heart attack

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

He can’t pardon state crimes, only federal, and he can still run for president if he’s in jail.

It would be interesting to have the sitting president do his term in jail though

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

Not just winning, but winning decisively so the Court can't give a victory to Trump anyway like they did for Bush. If there is any doubt, at all, about the election then Trump will probably be the next president.

And rather than rallying his base to fight fascism, he's browbeating them to vote blue no matter who. The president can't fail, he can only be failed. 🙃

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The problem is they're going to have to come up with a reason for that and it's going to get bandied about and completely rewrite the 14th Amendment.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
137 points (97.9% liked)

News

23397 readers
1759 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS