520
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Mozilla Corp., which manages the open-source Firefox browser, announced today that Mitchell Baker is stepping down as CEO to focus on AI and internet safety as chair of the nonprofit foundation. Laura Chambers, a Mozilla board member and entrepreneur with experience at Airbnb, PayPal, and eBay, will step in as interim CEO to run operations until a permanent replacement is found.

https://archive.is/rmMEb

Official Blog Post: A New Chapter for Mozilla: Focused Execution and an Expanded Role in Charting the Internet’s Future

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ferralcat 89 points 10 months ago

Reading this new CEOs job history on linkedin is kinda infuriating. She goes from intern to head of consumer products at Skype in less than a year. Just... Frustrating to read that while I am and manage really good people who struggle for decades in the trenches to get even paltry job opportunities.

But she got her MBA from Stanford so nepotism ahoy I guess.

[-] anarchist@lemmy.ml 78 points 10 months ago

Yeah. "Airbnb, Paypal, and ebay" doesn't inspire confidance either

[-] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 10 months ago

How is getting an MBA from Stanford nepotism? She probably worked her ass off not only to earn the degree but to be accepted to the university in the first place. Without knowing anything about her, I’m going to assume she’s a total rockstar until there’s a good reason to believe otherwise.

[-] density@kbin.social 48 points 10 months ago

working hard and nepotism aren't mutually exclusive

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Biggest predictor of future success is the zip code you're born into.

To your specific point, the preponderance of PERCEIVED hard work in the nepotism community is definitely worth mentioning. Hard work, as an objective measure, would be the exception in this camp.

[-] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago

Where is the evidence of nepotism? The person I replied to mentioned the Stanford degree and immediately jumped to the conclusion that it all comes down to nepotism. Frankly, it sounds like jealousy and taking cheap shots at someone who is doing well. I don’t understand it. Why knock someone else down? She’s successful so good for her. My own success will only come from me. What someone else did or did not achieve or how they did it is irrelevant to what I achieve.

[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

okay but still where is the nepotism? You've commented on the general hypothetical possibility of nepotism not having been dis-proven.

Being at Stanford in and of itself is not nepotism so it's a pretty fair question to those of us who want words to mean things.

[-] density@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Idk anything about this person in specific but my guess is that @ferralcat is referring to "legacy students". If you search for that term alone or in combination with "Standford" you can read all about what those words mean. The words have very well-understood meanings. For example:

Nearly 18% of Class of 2023 are legacy students or relatives of donors, report reveals

[-] Iapar@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Without knowing anything about her you shouldn't assume anything about her.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That...can't be accurate, surely? I've never known someone go from an internship to a senior IC role in less than a year, let alone leadership - unless the Skype head roles are glorified management roles?

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
520 points (99.4% liked)

Firefox

18050 readers
87 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS