-28
submitted 9 months ago by ira@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

Biden is self-destructing his own campaign.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Do you know of a willing candidate who has a significant chance of beating Trump other than Biden?

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 months ago

Hear that chirping?

The unmistakable sound of crickets.

[-] Substance_P@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

There may have been one, but the DNC and dark money would never have allowed it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

People keep saying things like this, but it's not like that stopped people like Bernie.

[-] Substance_P@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well I would argue that the DNC did stop Bernie with the desire to get Hillary on the ballot. But getting back to the question; It's a long shot because of the naturalized citizen angle, but Cenk Uygur (known from the TYT podcasts) perhaps would be an interesting choice. A Turkish-born American though, sadly this will disqualify him with the current electoral rules, but at least he's educated, and not over 80, and I know he's fighting to stay in the run despite these hurdles.

[-] ira@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

The Florida Democratic Party's executive committee voted to cancel their primary at the end of October 2023 and declare Biden the winner

The Tennessee Democratic Party decided to list only Biden as a ballot option for its primary after a November 11 meeting

The North Carolina Democratic Party acknowledged receiving requests for ballot access from Phillips and other candidates, but chose to only include Biden for its primary

The Democratic Party of Wisconsin left Phillips off the ballot; he appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court on January 26, 2024. The court unanimously ruled on February 2 that Phillips should be included on the ballot.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Phillips_2024_presidential_campaign

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You really think people want Dean Phillips to be president?

Do they like his idea of putting Elonk Musk in his cabinet?

But sure, we definitely need a former CEO and one of the wealthiest men in congress to be president because, as we've learned, wealthy CEOs make the best presidents.

Oh, and if you want someone who is going to be hardline on Israel, it won't be Dean Phillips.. I'm sure his buddies on Fox & Friends are right there with him on that one.

From what I can tell, the "draw" of Phillips is he isn't as old as Biden. Because he sure doesn't sound like a good alternative to me.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago

I'd say it's less of a question of willingness and more of a question of "will the Democratic establishment tolerate this" thing. There is no discussion about support for Israel for example, and that's just the most glaringly current one. Trump is awful in a lot of other ways, but one of his crimes is acting the radical to Biden's moderate, making Biden and the Dems the only sensible choice.

There is a problem with not being able to vote for people who would represent you, and only being able to vote for someone who is not a literal fascist. The US should be able to do better than one of its leading presidential candidates touting the accomplishment of identifying a whale in a picture book correctly.

In a functioning democracy, there is more than one sane choice.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

There is no shortage of people who could be willing to challenge the Democratic establishment. They just aren't doing it. Unless you count Dean Phillips, and I don't.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

It's hard to challenge the establishment if it is as established as it is. By the nature of the system, a challenger running on public healthcare or repealing anti-labour union regulations can't come from outside the Dem party, since third party candidates don't go anywhere. But you also can't get anywhere with that inside the party, because you would be a fringe.

The problem is that people don't get to vote on policy, policy shifts depend on internal party dynamics. And that's awfully far from a healthy democracy. Can you vote for prohibiting right-to-work laws in your next election? In mine, I get to say climate change is important to me, or free enterprise, or strong border controls, or a better healthcare system. I get to vote on issues that impact me and are important to me, largely without them being bundled together with stuff I don't like. It's not perfect, but it's not like I get to choose between voting for the interests of corporations versus nazis.

[-] ira@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Biden is the worst candidate of the bunch by that metric. His favorability is 17 points underwater right now, and he's losing to Trump in most recent polls by around 4 to 6 points. And keep in mind that that's measuring popular vote, not electoral votes. Hillary won the popular vote by 2 points and still lost the election. Biden needs to lead Trump by at least 3 points to even have a chance, it took a +4.5 margin to win last time around. And while we're comparing to Hillary, her favorability was only 15 points underwater in October after the Comey report.

Cornel West would be a way better choice. Even Dean Phillips would be less bad of a choice (y'know that whole "lesser evil" thing and all that). In polls, a generic Democrat leads Trump by 6 points.

But it's all a moot point because Democrats keep shutting down primaries and removing candidates from the ballot. They're attempting another coronation just like they did in 2016 - why would any candidate try to run when the party leadership is shutting them down?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So you can't actually name a willing candidate who has a significant chance of beating Trump other than Biden. Gotcha.

By the way, you are aware that Cornel West isn't running as a Democrat, right?

[-] ira@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago

Gotcha.

Bazinga!

I'm super impressed by your ability to ignore literally everything I wrote.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I read everything you wrote. It ignored what I wrote, which was:

Do you know of a willing candidate who has a significant chance of beating Trump other than Biden?

You did not name one. You made a lot of excuses, but you didn't name one. Unless you think Cornell West has a chance of beating Trump. Polls certainly don't suggest so.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
-28 points (31.1% liked)

politics

19135 readers
1226 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS