526
‘I Don't Believe Deepfakes Should Be Regulated,' Says Man Who Is the Reason Deepfakes Should Be Regulated (reductress.com)
submitted 9 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/theonion@midwest.social
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago

thats already illegal

[-] 520@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

In a courtroom sure. What about putting it on YouTube?

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago

So you have no issues with me distributing deepfakes of you burning crosses across your neighborhood?

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

I'm not saying deepfakes should not be regulated.

I'm saying the examples are poor because scamming people is already illegal.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago

So you aren't actually syaing anything at all. You're just being contrarian for the sake of it.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 9 months ago

Not exactly. Arguments like "they should be regulated because they can be used for illegal stuff" are moot, since those usages are already regulated. I'm on the fence on the whole regulation thing and I've yet to see any actual realistic examples on how regulation would look.

Is it even logical to regulate ai images specifically, or should we lump it in together with any form of image manipulation?

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
526 points (97.3% liked)

The Onion

4509 readers
912 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
seahorse@midwest.social
pbrisgreat@midwest.social