263
submitted 9 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Archive: [ https://archive.is/z7xcs ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kefirchik@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

These are confirmed and identified casualties using 3rd party evidence. From the source you linked,

However, these figures represent only a partial account and do not reflect the full extent of the casualties. […] This week, CIA Director William Burns penned a column in Foreign Affairs estimating the total losses of the Russian army—killed and wounded—at 315,000. At first glance, this figure might seem significantly different from our own count, but in reality, it’s not, and we regard Burns’ estimate as close to the truth.

The reality is that we will not know for a long time the true numbers, but this 43k is the absolute minimum number of dead Russian combatants.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago

While 43 is obviously a lower bound, it gives a rough idea of the overall casualties which aren't going to be an order of magnitude higher.

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
263 points (96.5% liked)

World News

32359 readers
469 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS