1074
submitted 8 months ago by Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

Except legally the burden is on Samsung to prove you damaged the battery. They don't get to say "oh well you could have done xyz, denied"

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

No, it's not. That's an impossible standard for the company to hold.

You buy the product under the assessment that you will void the warranty by doing XYZ, if you want that level of access you have made changes that could have damaged the battery and they don't have the time to grill every wannabe tech douche to make sure they didn't fuck up the device themselves.

They tell you what you can and can't do with the product AND still receive support up front, case closed.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago
[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Ah yes, a Vice article from 2016. Absolute pinnacle of the understanding of law.

If this had even a shred of truth there would have already been dozens of class action lawsuits from people like OP.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
1074 points (97.6% liked)

Memes

45426 readers
1390 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS