It's hard to know because we don't know exactly what the rest of the Resistance will do as Israel approaches that brink, not to mention if Israel will even be able to maintain enough surface-level control to carry out mass evacuations nor whether Gazans would even obey and would rather flee north and hide even if the chance of death is very high, but even in the worst case scenario, it doesn't like, end the war, y'know.

Like, it's not as if, Israel expels a million Palestinians into the Sinai - Mission Complete! Final Fantasy victory fanfare sounds! History ends here! You Win! They would still have to deal with the armed groups inside Gaza - to which they have been attriting heavily to - and the aftermath of that action on a local, regional, and global level. It's a facet of defeat, but it's not The End Of Palestine™.

Hell, let's assume that every Palestinian that isn't an armed militant drops dead tomorrow. Does that end the Israeli internal crisis? No. It would continue with a mostly unchanged intensity. The civilian and military spheres of this conflict are somewhat related, but not directly, and there's no way of analysing the conflict if you can't simultaneously realize that the civilian situation is a total disaster but the military situation is going pretty well for Gaza right now, as guerrilla wars go. In anti-colonial wars, especially guerrilla wars, the deaths of extremely high numbers of civilians is basically baked in because the settlers are deranged, bloodthirsty monsters unless they experience enough violence to be forced into submission, and even then they might grumble. Algeria, Vietnam, the DPRK, Libya, Ethiopia. This conflict isn't uniquely terrible (aside from the time it's taking place and the weapons being used) - the better part of a million civilians died in Algeria. 20% of the DPRK's population perished and there were no above-ground structures left standing. Hell, some of our grandparents and great grandparents, if of a certain nationality and ideology, would have been doing bizarre TikTok dances celebrating the mass bombing of irrigation dams in the DPRK or the millions of Congo amputations had TikTok been around back then and had those atrocities been easily conveyed to the rest of the world. So it's not really right to be like "Death to fucking Israel, the death toll is now X hundred thousand people, they've expelled the native population to a different region / the concentration camps, I guess the war is lost," because such death tolls are just the historical precedent of even successful anti-colonial wars.

(To go on a brief rant, I genuinely don't believe the "Western psyche", if one can be said to exist in that general of a sense, hasn't progressed one iota since at least 1900, and probably earlier. Western liberals could very, very easily justify doing another Holocaust if it was against "people who deserved it", whether that be Chinese people or immigrants of various nationalities or certain minorities. I don't even really mean like, "We have to be constantly vigilant for fascism because the people who did the Holocaust were humans just like you and me," I mean like, the same people who are saying that we have to be constantly vigilant against fascism could themselves justify another Holocaust because "it's not really fascism to want to round up and separate those people, it's just common sense really." I mean, how many people died in American wars in the Middle East this side of the turn of the millennium? Do American liberals really, deeply care, or are they just being like "Oh yeah, uh, war is, uh, bad, now that we're not really actively fighting it anymore."? It's hard-baked into the fundamental code of liberalism. It is the black hole that isn't directly visible but is revealed by everything else orbitting around it.)