1790

Android privacy ROM >> iOS (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

241 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

IOS has a files app where saved files go

Basically the same as your download directory

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Yeah lol I love how this commenter is mad about apps being sandboxed. There’s a downloads folder in the files app, or apps can have their own virtual filesystems, also accessible within the files app. Stupid iOS and ensuring that apps can’t just write to wherever they want on the filesystem

[-] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

To be fair, you can't write wherever you want on Android, either. For example, you can't write to most of the files in /Android ~~unless you use one of the many, many exploits to do so~~ since it's basically a protected system area.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That’s fair, I was more concerned with someone getting mad at increased security like sandboxing is a bad thing

[-] HumanPenguin@lemmy.cafe 1 points 8 months ago

He was more mad at the app developers for not putting effort into mzking the android port appropriate for android. And the fact that they don't bother providing common needed functions for android apps. Like configurable settings.

Im not an expert on either as I tend to be a linux pc developer.

But user accounts is the way linux handles a program having its own space. Andriod has def made a choice from the begging not to have, and now to limit. The multi user part of linux. Assigning a user and group account to programs. Works great as a way of limiting programs ability to interfere with files of other programs without su access to allow the approval of only assess to those approved.

So I agree android makes a bad choice to ignore any extra protection.