138
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 79 points 9 months ago

The only thing the Western media portrayed him as was as an opponent of Putin. His nationalist tendencies were unknown to Western libs.

[-] Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml 53 points 9 months ago

As so was his irrelevancy in the general landscape of Russian politics.

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 9 months ago

Never fails to take me out when I hear know-nothing burgers talking about "if there were an election he'd have beat putler 2:1" and I'm just fighting the urge to start smirking like "oh, so the same margins that clinton was supposed to beat trump by right?"

[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 9 months ago

Wonders of fake news. I had to explain to my gf today that he was in fact not the only opposition to Putin.

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 9 months ago

Libs framed him as a russian MLK ๐Ÿ˜…

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 8 points 9 months ago
[-] areyoulessthan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago

In the minds of western libs, nations in what the west calls "the jungle" doesn't have a fully-fledged political system with differing ideologies and interests based in material conditions. Instead they just have a simple pro-democracy/pro-western Vs. pro-BadCountry/authoritarian divide.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
138 points (99.3% liked)

World News

2315 readers
229 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS