503
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Bangladeshi residents and others in Monfalcone say decisions to prohibit worship at cultural centres and banning burkinis at the beach is part of anti-Islam agenda

The envelope containing two partially burned pages of the Qur’an came as a shock. Until then, Muslim residents in the Adriatic port town of Monfalcone had lived relatively peacefully for more than 20 years.

Addressed to the Darus Salaam Muslim cultural association on Via Duca d’Aosta, the envelope was received soon after Monfalcone’s far-right mayor, Anna Maria Cisint, banned prayers on the premises.

“It was hurtful, a serious insult we never expected,” said Bou Konate, the association’s president. “But it was not a coincidence. The letter was a threat, generated by a campaign of hate that has stoked toxicity.”

Monfalcone’s population recently passed 30,000. Such a positive demographic trend would ordinarily spell good news in a country grappling with a rapidly declining birthrate, but in Monfalcone, where Cisint has been nurturing an anti-Islam agenda since winning her first mandate in 2016, the rise has not been welcomed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

Probably because there is a, perceived or cultivated, associations between Muslims and immigrants/people of color. And if you can't outright punish someone based on "race" you go after the closest thing.

[-] Gympie_Gympie_pie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

It’s not about skin colour, it’s about a way of life that is considered too radically different from their own: racists assume that muslims don’t want to integrate in Italian society, don’t follow the rules, abuse women with their hijabs and restrictions of movement (muslim women can’t drive nor go anywhere without a male relative). The native Muslim community is so minuscule in Italy that most Muslims are immigrants and speak other languages Italians don’t understand and makes them suspicious. They are concerned they could hide weapons under their tunics and hijabs. They don’t like that they cover their face and can’t be identified. It’s the lifestyle that they are bothered with, the skin colour is irrelevant. Italians were equally racist against Albanians in the 90ies because they were migrating in Italy by the thousands per day and were committing a lot of crimes, and Albanians are caucasians.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

muslim women can’t drive nor go anywhere without a male relative

This only true in middle east. Muslim women in south east asia don't have this restriction and can do whatever they want like living alone, drive cars and hold any job, even leadership positions such as president and ministers.

They are concerned they could hide weapons under their tunics and hijabs. They don’t like that they cover their face and can’t be identified.

People can already conceal weapons beneath their jacket or suit, and covid basically normalize wearing masks in a lot of countries (not sure about Italy, is it normal for a person to walk around wearing masks there?).

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

muslim women can’t drive nor go anywhere without a male relative

That’s actually not true, it is accepted that as long as one remains within the border of a city or county, there is need for a male to escort, the dispute is only about traveling outside of the city, some say it’s not necessary even then, some say it is necessary if they need to stay for a night, some say 3 nights, but this ‘can’t travel anywhere without male’ is completely wrong, this is might be stated by conservative(s) or maybe racists idk about that

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

Wrong, it's all about culture. Most muslims has fairly light skin anyways. A skin colour is very superficial, what's important is whether you integrate or not. I have nothing against people of colour at all, but Islam makes me very uncomfortable

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Well, you are not obliged to follow it, you can’t use this as an excuse to take away their rights, I don’t like iPhones so I am going to ban them

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Why are they coming in the first place. If they wanna come to a foreign country, it's their job to adopt to the local culture, not the other way around

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What do you mean by ‘local culture’, if that means that one should stop practicing their religion, than that goes against your own constitution, if you want a place like that, then by all means, make a ‘local culture’ where everyone is only allowed to do what you or the majority wants, but then spell it out clearly in your book, then if someone goes against, they are at fault, but you put on the image of secularism and freedom of expression, and then deny one particular group this right

And the word for these kind of people rhymes with ‘fascist’

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

It's about not tolerating the intolerant. There's no rights for women, illegal to be gay etc, according to sharia law. Muhammed was a slave owner, and had multiple wives (including a 6 year old child) and concubines. Most muslims in western countries do far more crime than the locals. Why should we be ok with these people tearing apart everything our ancestors built?

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Huh? Why does every discussion on muslim rights always start getting to Muhammad when y’all can’t justify your hypocrisy, how many modern day muslims have slaves or multiple wives/marry under the present age of consent in your country? The topic is why are you taking away their basic rights guaranteed to them by your country itself, if they do any of the things mentioned above in the present day, then that should be dealt separately

Most muslims in western countries do far more crimes than locals

Sauce?

And arab countries are not a very great example in most things but one thing you can’t deny is that they have extremely low crime rates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Saudi_Arabia

A simple google search was enough from on your side, but since you don’t seem to be arguing in good faith, I put some wiki links for you

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sauce: https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/artikler-og-publikasjoner/nye-tall-for-siktelser-og-innvandrerbakgrunn

Sure UAE/Saudia Arabia have low criminality rates, but you also have no rights there, and death sentences are a thing

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Can you provide me an English link? My browser can’t seem to be able to translate it

Edit: nvm got it

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago
[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That specifically talks about immigrants so that still doesn’t justify your prejudice, but since I can’t read the study i will refrain from saying anything

But like I said if you believe it’s a problem then stop putting on the face of secularism and say that we will not entertain or give the rights to Muslims, then that’s a non issue, however you can’t simultaneously show that you don’t discriminate but then continue to do this kind of stuff

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I can’t seem to find one that sorts by religion, can you provide me an English with link to the exact page?

And if having a death penalty for being a rapist (I am not talk about minorities here) means a lot less no. of overall women raped, than I am more than happy tbh, the rules are strict but they also mean it is a lot lot safer, a person is gonna think twice before stealing your hard earned mac because of the fear of amputation (even though it’s not commonly done)

My current city is suffering with a rape epidemic, and the reason for that is most people can get out of jail after a few months if they provide enough money or have enough power, if they just announce that death penalty, I’d be happy

But we are drifting off topic here

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I can’t seem to find one that sorts by religion, can you provide me an English with link to the exact page?

You can look at which countries are overrepresented, and what the Islam populations of these contries are. Compare that to the underrepresented countries.

Furthermore there's countless of news articles about violent riots caused by muslims, and murder attempts towards Quran burners. And that's just Norway. The situation in Sweden has been extreme lately, far worse than in Norway, or anywhere else in Europe. It got so bad that they asked the military for help. I will give you countless sources, but right now I'm at work, and don't have time

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Uh, maybe let’s say you are right, I can’t seem to make heads nor tails of the website, but if that’s the case, then I could see where you are coming from, but I still think that discriminating an entire religious group that makes up 25% of the world population for some bad actors is till racism

Edit: but why are you guys burning quran anyway?

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Murder attempt: https://youtu.be/rMGBz5Zxld4 Rioting: https://youtu.be/oQSBqdEt-Bo More rioting and aggressiveness https://youtu.be/feCEk81OATQ Even more rioting: https://youtu.be/FlfgiSEiTfY Even more rioting: https://www.bt.no/hendelser/i/wAQRoo/eritrea-demonstrasjon-endte-i-slagsmaal-politiet-ber-folk-holde-seg-unna Swedish military having to get involved due to kurdish gang violence in Sweden: https://www.tv2.no/nyheter/sverige-forsvaret-skal-hjelpe-politiet-i-gjengkrigen/16089740/

Etc, you get the point. Who are burning the quran? SIAN (Stopp islamisering av Norge - Stop Islamization of Norway). It's a legitimate critisism towards against an anti-western religion that is getting increased footing in Norway.

A religion isn't a race, so it's not racism. It's not just some bad actors, it's a disproportionally higher amount than any other group. When 25% of the world population are muslims, why does Norway/Europe need to take them in as refugees? Europe itself has less than 10% of the world population, and Norways has less than 1% of Europes population. It's way better for all parties if they're taken in by someone with a more similar culture, instead.

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It’s upto norway to decide whether they want to take Muslims or not, so I am not gonna debate that, and from here I guess you are right that maybe a particular group might be causing more problems than others, but then I think you should clearly spell it out and say muslims will be under extra scrutiny/different laws, don’t put on the image of secularism, which is my entire point

It’s a legitimate criticism towards against an anti western religion that is getting increased footing in norway

Okay I am genuinely curious here, I am not very well versed about what’s going on in norway but I surely haven’t heard anything major like muslims planning a coup and overthrowing the government, or is this something else I don’t know

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There's a pressure towards EU/EØS countries to take in so called "quota refugees". Norway is way to willing in that regard. Our politicians, and unfortunately way to many people living here, are taking them in way too willingly.

Secularism: imo all religions, even christianity should be threated as a cult. Secularism should be less about freedom of religion, and more about freedom from religion. Doesn't mean I want to burn down all of our churches and history, just that we should move forward with less religion rather than more.

About overthrowing, there may not be any concrete plan, but many muslims share the same goal of "spreading their faith". Lebanon is an example of a country that got destabilized into a civil war, after taking in too many palestinian refugees, turning it into a muslim majority country.

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Imho countries like Lebanon would probably have descended on civil war anyway because of lack of resources and brutal military intervention by guess who

imo all religions, even christianity should be treated as a cult

Here is the problem, conveniently made a comment about this just somewhere above in this post. https://lemmy.world/comment/7735405

We both disagree on a very fundamental thing as you can see, I don’t see any point in continuing the discussion further, thanks for your time

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I feel like I have to make a final comment, because I disagree strongly with the comment you linked. That being an atheist is about being cool and edgy. One of the main reasons I dislike religion in the first place (especially Islam), is due to all the horrible stuff happening in the name of some religion. Stuff like religous wars, hatred towards other religions, rejecting science, and controlling of others (especially women). You may call atheism a religion on its own, and that I hate muslims, but I disagree. It's all about not tolerating the intolerant.

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

horrible stuff happening in the name of religion

Well I hate that too and Ig I should have clarified that, for me religion is something you study and own but only for yourself, not something you impose on others, sure you can share it, but forcing it, a big NO

Science is comparatively not talked that much about in religion because it is not the main topic

Talking about quran specifically, I don’t think you will find anything that goes against established science, because all of the things it talks about are not some rocket science but rather everyday observations (plants growing, embryos etc), and I know it’s far fetched, but if you study comparative religion, you wont find anything in it that completely contradicts common sense, or is forced or bigoted, some strict rules that might exist are part of what you accept when you accept a particular religion/take part in something, and since there is no compulsion, I don’t think there is a problem (https://quran.com/al-baqarah/256)

And I would also like to add that that I understand your frustration, a tree is recognized by it’s fruit, you can’t say ‘Oh we are the worst kind of people, but my religion makes sense, see for yourself’, I think any sane person will respond somewhere along the lines ‘Why should I tolerate a tree whose products are rotten people like you’ or something idk I can’t seem to come up with anything better, so it’s something we all have to work on

Edit: And a lot of strict rules about women aren’t that strict to begin with, they were just made so by overly conservative people or people who somewhat misunderstood some quranic verses based specifically about the prophets household, thankfully most people nowadays are of a much more moderate position (see for eg nouman ali khan, he is stated as conservative by a lot of people, but you could see his stance his much different than what the media and extremely conservative scholars might make you believe)

So I will say, that your frustration is not completely unreasonable, but I will still maintain that taking someones basic right based on the fact that they are muslims is wrong, you can maybe put them in extra scrutiny when traveling or in public spaces, but stopping them from making a prayer? I don’t think so

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/rMGBz5Zxld4

https://piped.video/oQSBqdEt-Bo

https://piped.video/feCEk81OATQ

https://piped.video/FlfgiSEiTfY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Well, I thought I had a little insight on the matter since I'm Italian, guess I was wrong. /s

[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Italy isn't the only European country with lots of muslim immigrants though. Idk about Italy, but in Norway it's 100% the culture people have a problem with

According to wikipedia you only have about 1% muslims.

That's nothing (relatively speaking), and on par with Iceland. In Norway it's at least 3,1%, with the capital itself having a ridiculous 12%

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
503 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39144 readers
1202 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS