350
submitted 9 months ago by CMake@lemmy.today to c/facepalm@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Statistics get murky due to (suspected?) under reporting by victims who identify as male because society still makes people feel "weak" or "like it is their fault" if they are raped. I am not entirely convinced as to how much that evens things out (mostly because victims who identify as female ALSO drastically under report due to an understanding that the legal system will just call them a slut and move on...), but it is a good thing to keep in mind and victims who identify as male SHOULD seek help.

In a perfect world? I would want an extra line about "but Josie was too drunk to say no" and maybe do a gender flipped one too. But there are reasons I don't write short and concise flyers.

But the issue with explaining that neither party can consent is... what we see in this thread. Lots of people who insist that because neither side could consent then it isn't rape and nobody is in the wrong. Because that CAN be true. But the reality is that "Well, we both had a few shots of whiskey and both wanted it at the same time" that ignores differences in body weight and tolerance to alcohol and whatever meds a person might be on and so forth. Which mostly gets back to the age old "Get her drunk and fuck her" mentality that involves "hey, let's both do shots" and so forth.

Its one of those cases where less nuance is actually PROBABLY better. Because you either understand the law at play and don't feel the need to go into a great discussion and debate of it... or you are the kind of monster who is carrying around a printout of the law so you know what you can get away with.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Idk man, I'd rather just have a poster that says:

REGARDLESS OF AGE, WEIGHT, OR GENDER

A PERSON CANNOT CONSENT WHILE INTOXICATED


YOU WILL BE CHARGED WITH RAPE,

YOU WILL BE BARRED FROM HIGHER EDUCATION,

YOU MAY SERVE PRISON TIME,

AND YOU MIGHT EVEN BE FORCED TO LIVE IN A

SEPERATE NEIGHBORHOOD AMONGST

OTHER SEX OFFENDERS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE.

In big bold red letters on a white background. If the people seeing it don't understand after that, then they're a lost cause.

Nah. 18 year old me would read this and think... everyone I know is getting drunk and having sex all the time, but I don't know anyone that's been charged with rape and never heard of people forced to live on whatever rapist neighbourhood.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

If the people seeing it don’t understand after that, then they’re a lost cause.

Sorry that's just not how communication works.

If you're trying to tell someone something, making dramatic claims just undermines your credibility.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

The logic you're using could be used to defend any number of stupid illegal activities, it's got a real hardcore SovCit vibe.

This is a very generic retort. Are you... a bot ?

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

Maybe you're the bot and you don't even know it.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

These nuances are why this poster is absolute shit, though. Sex, rape, and consent are such incredibly deep, complicated topics that you really can't boil them down to a poster and have it touch on a fraction of what it needs to.

Right now, this poster very much makes it out to always be the guy's fault. That's an issue, even if it's not the case. I can see this poster having an inverse effect. The people who need to understand it have a knee jerk counter reaction, and the people who have enough understanding to deduce the nuance already aren't raping people.

The poster is at best worthless, a tree gives its life for that, or it's actively harmful.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
350 points (88.2% liked)

Facepalm

2325 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS