169
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Alabama is seeking to put a second inmate to death using nitrogen gas, a move that comes a month after the state carried out the first execution using the controversial new method.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office asked the state Supreme Court on Wednesday to set an execution date for Alan Eugene Miller. The state said Miller’s execution would be carried out using nitrogen. Miller, now 59, was convicted of killing three people during a pair of 1999 workplace shootings in suburban Birmingham.

“The State of Alabama is prepared to carry out the execution of Miller’s sentence by means of nitrogen hypoxia,” the attorney general’s office wrote, adding that Miller has been on death row since 2000 and that it is time to carry out his sentence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 47 points 8 months ago

Nitrogen Asphyxiation in the workplace is insanely dangerous specifically because humans (and most animals) don't have a way to detect nitrogen displacement...

The body detects hypoxia by build up of CO2, or more accurately carbonic acid, not loss of O2 - it doesn't expect for nitrogen to be the thing to displace all the oxygen, so you literally don't notice it. There's countless stories of people fainting and dying due to not realising the situation they were in.

So how in fuck's name did Alabama manage to botch it so badly that the first guy had an agonising death via seizure?? It takes a special kind of neglect to make that happen.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

They put him in a mask instead of a sealed room. The mask filled with CO2, and may have not had a perfect seal due to thrashing as he struggled to breathe.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

There are ways the masks could have worked but really to do this kind of thing humanly you need a sealed chamber with enough volume for CO2 to diffuse into or some kind of scrubber at the bottom pulling air out and displaced with pure N2 at the top.

It's difficult to tell if they are using the setup they are because of incompetence trying to seek out the cheapest solution, or malice and using the cheapest solution that will cause the maximum agony and suffering. It's pretty bad when bringing back hanging would be a more humane way of executing people than this travesty.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

I don't understand how they even fucked it up. You have a very shallow mask with positive pressure from the nitrogen gas and a valve that opens when there is any extra pressure. Person breathes out CO2 and some nitrogen gas is expelled, person breathes in, almost only Nitrogen gas is inhaled. Am I missing something? I am not an engineer, but this seems like a way you could do it.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Congratulations, you're now the mayor of Alabama.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well that makes sense - without any exhaust, the volume of nitrogen available wouldn't properly displace the air from his lungs before he put the mask in...

So he could've essentially just died from regular asphyxiation, which is quite painful, with a side of nitrogen.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Yes, that's what happened. He was tortured to death for over 20 minutes.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Why don't they apply anesthesia first? If I can get conked out so bad that I can't remember getting my wisdom teeth removed wouldn't that totally knock you out before being gassed?

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 8 months ago

You need a medic to administer the anesthesia and no medic is going to participate on that.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That's because if you mess it up you could kill somebody

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 months ago

Pharmaceutical companies will not supply those kinds of drugs for executions, because they understandably don't want their products associated with killing people.

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

Done properly, the nitrogen is basically an anesthesiac. It knocks you out real good.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

If they can't properly enact what should've been a painless execution, how do you expect them to properly anesthetise someone?

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Isn't the danger of improperly applying anesthesia that you could kill someone?

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

Of an overdose sure, but if they botch it the other way, there's a good possibility the prisoner never properly goes under or they wake up during the execution, either way experiencing the full pain of death.

That I'd figure is the worse of the results, and likely the one that'd happen given these guys seem to have a knack for torturous executions.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Isn't that still better than no anesthesia at all? Assuming that the execution method wasn't changed to be worse.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

Technically speaking yes, but that assumes they're treated the same. It's almost certain that if the executioners are under the illusion their anesthesia has worked, they're not going to do things in such a way as to minimise pain.

Prisons seem determined to turn executions into torture sessions - and while the need for capital punishment can be debated all day, we can all agree that the death is supposed to be the punishment, not the procedure.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 0 points 8 months ago

Because that would make a lot of sense, but the world doesn't work that way

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The cruelty is the point

[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it just didn't end up working as well as scientists thought it would. Maybe there's more to painless nitrogen execution besides just filling a container with nitrogen. It's not like they can just test a nitrogen death chamber before rolling it out. We'll see if the next execution goes the same way or not.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Alabama did not listen to scientists. Medical science understands the roles of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen quite well, and predicted that filling a mask with nitrogen would be a horrible application of the technology. The mask did not ventilate his own breathe, so the high concentrations of nitrogen did not displace the oxygen and carbon dioxide fast enough to avoid the gasping asphyxiation reflex.

There were specific recommendations made by scientists. Either use a mask with a one-way valve that exhausts exhalation, or fill a chamber of sufficient volume that will render the concentrations of his own exhalation insignificant. Alabama did neither, and it was a disaster.

[-] shitwolves@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 8 months ago

I think the problem was that they didn't actually use a chamber and instead tried to use a mask, IIRC

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 8 months ago

I think there's a few contextual factors...

If someone doesn't know they're being asphyxiated with nitrogen they might just pass out.

If someone wants to euthanise themselves by nitrogen asphyxiation they might just drift off peacefully.

... but if someone doesn't want to die and knows they're being asphyxiated it's probably not going to be so peaceful.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
169 points (96.7% liked)

News

23267 readers
3485 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS