166
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago

For reference, if atmospheric pressure at sea level is about 1 bar, "low vacuum" is between 0.3 and 0.001 bar.

Huh. Insane they actually build that. It's basically impossible to ever make it economical though. Just go slower, build more trains and lower prices. Way more benefit to society.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

The US should be having a rail-measuring contest with China, not a hype®loop-measuring one.

[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah China is doing real well in that department.

I mean if we lived in a post-scarcity utopia and build these hyperloops under ground it might be a worthwhile investment. If we had more advanced tech for tunnel digging robots and maybe 3D printing the walls out of the material we take out etc. But if you include the energy for just maintaining the vacuum against small leaks it's probably not better than airplanes. Maybe with some kind of genetically engineered bio-crete that automatically seals small cracks. But even when we'd advanced to that level of tech and automation to make it viable, it would still have to compete with a fleet of ultra cheap vertical take of electric aircraft.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

It still takes the technology further, and we learn something from it that may or may not be useful in future.

[-] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The idea is to compete with planes because making them climate friendly is a damn hard problem to solve and China has a lot of domestic flights. When you put it in that context, the economic cost makes more sense.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
166 points (95.1% liked)

Futurology

2474 readers
145 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS