48
‘Uncommitted’ Campaign in Michigan Shatters Expectations Against Biden
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
48 points (68.2% liked)
politics
19107 readers
1994 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
And what was the point? At best, it’s being a a useful idiot for conservatives, as this isn’t being reported as pro-Gaza, but as anti-Biden.
The point is that running against someone worse doesn't give anyone a free pass to actively support crimes against humanity.
Just because we vastly prefer him over the other guy doesn't mean we have to pretend that he can do no wrong and meekly accept that he's complicit in some of the worst atrocities being committed in the world right now.
Because the billionaire-owned MSM, like you, has an enormous pro-Biden bias and is married to the false dichotomy of "other guy worse means our guy blameless"
"Better than Trump" is far too low a bar for anyone of importance, much less one of the most powerful and influential human beings in the world.
Who says you can't? I don't like Biden, either. But making him look weak just pushes us toward another Trump term.
Lol, do you think the media has a pro-Biden bias? Quite the opposite. Biden misspeaks about some foreign leader, and the media rushes to print "Is Biden too senile?" while Trump forgets his wife's name and you get crickets from the MSM. The MSM regularly buries negative Trump stories while amplifying anything to make you question Biden. This reporting is proof of that. I do not get how you think reporting that this vote is anti-Biden is somehow pro-Biden.
It is, but it is the only bar we have. Again, this is shaping up to be 2016 all over again. People don't like the Dem, so they stay home and let Trump eke out a narrow victory.
So many fucking words to just reiterate the same false dichotomy and spout Trump-like false martyrdom claims 🤦
What false dichotomy? Dichotomy might be the best definition for our 2 party system. We indeed have an actual dichotomy.
Yes, I'd rather have a different choice. There certainly isn't a dichotomy of ideas. But when it comes down to it, Biden and Trump will be the only legitimate choices on the ballot.
The false dichotomy is that all mentions of either of them boil down to either "Trump bad so Biden good" or "Biden bad so Trump good".
It's lazy, it's disingenuous and it destroys all hope of keeping elected officials from your own "team" accountable for their words, actions and lack of both.
That is a straw man. We are not saying that at all.
Your automatic dismissal of any criticism of him as bad faith attempts to "make him look bad" sure as hell is.
You even said verbatim that it all IS a dichotomy just now!
The ELECTION is a dichotomy. But you know what, you don't want to debate in good faith. Enjoy 4 more years of Trump, because that is what is coming with these attitudes.
Thanks for confirming all of what you just called a strawman.
Good luck with your Dear Leader. I sincerely hope he's going to start listening to the people before it's too late so that a Trump white house isn't inflicted on the world again.
Nah see I am playing 3-d chess. By not voting for Trump, it is the same as voting for Biden.
I learned that from all the democrats on lemmy.
It is a half vote for each, then,
Just ask yourself, would you rather 4 more years of Biden or Trump? That is the only important question.
I’ve already asked myself these questions.
About twenty years ago I made the hard decision to never vote for a self identifying neoliberal president. I made this decision after reading years of articles proving that neoliberal economic policies not only don’t work, but make the problems worse. I did vote for Obama so I guess it’s technically been less than 20 years. When the DNC decided and argued in court they are not beholden to voters, nor are they required to follow their own established rules, that’s what finally gave me the courage to stand by my conviction on this issue.
I vote every election, every year and every primary.
Thankfully I live in a state that was purple but has since gone blue. Biden will get our electoral points for my state I am hopeful. But I’m not going to bubble in either Biden nor Trump.
If you feel your decision is the answer to what you believe is the only important question, then vote for who you feel that you must. I do see your point. But I believe there are more important questions that I regularly ask myself and base who I vote for on that.