103
Oregon undoes groundbreaking drug decriminalization law
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
103 points (95.6% liked)
News
36735 readers
442 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Okay, I'll probably make a few posts as I work through this, please forgive the shit format, but I have only small breaks. So, your link on robberies only focuses on one business, it doesn't provide any information about whether actual burglaries (which is what this properly is) or general property crime is increasing, and whether it's increasing disproportionate to the pacific region or the rest of the country. We don't have this law in Cali, and I saw stories and articles like this here, too. I think your evidence in this regard is very wanting.
The law passed in 2020, the dramatic increases in crime started happening virtually immediately.
That's just one story, there are many, many like it.
https://www.kgw.com/article/money/business/survey-portland-businesses-break-ins-vandalism/283-1f1d2229-20ad-42a4-bd5d-58c24143daba
https://www.bizjournals.com/portland/news/2023/03/07/portland-small-business-break-in-vandalism-2022.html
Alright, first of all, I want to let you know that I'm speaking with you from a place of respect. Tone gets lost in text, and I don't want to convey contentiousness. Thank you for taking the time to have this discussion.
Okay, you have anecdotes and surveys. That's really all the first link is, and I find it to be, again, lacking in any kind of hard evidence about an increase in property crime that's statistically significant. The second link is paywalled, so I can't speak to it.
Same survey group asking small busineses in 2022 "Hey, you been broken into?" 63% say yes.
2023 - 78% say yes.
Not a good look. And this is only small business, like this one who closed after being broken into 15 times (!):
https://www.koin.com/news/civic-affairs/rains-pdx-closes-cites-employee-safety-crime-in-portland/
It's not counting places like REI:
https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2023/04/rei-to-close-its-only-portland-store-citing-break-ins-theft.html
Or Target:
https://www.wweek.com/news/courts/2023/10/17/target-has-been-complaining-to-city-officials-about-crime-at-shuttered-stores-for-over-a-year/
Or Nike:
https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2023/02/nike-wants-to-hire-off-duty-police-as-security-to-keep-portland-stores-open.html
Or Fred Meyer (Kroger):
https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2023/06/portland-partners-with-fred-meyer-to-increase-security-at-stores-to-combat-theft-crimes.html
Okay, I'm not interested in the big retailers because they made a lot of noise lying (yes, lying) about big increases in national theft rates. This could easily be part of the same narrative that they've been using to shutter stores without scaring the shit out of shareholders.
I will listen to small businesses. So, the next thing we need to know is we need burglary statistics from other big cities in the pacific region outside of Oregon to determine if the increase is statistically significant or if it's just noise. 19 other cities is the minimum of what we need. I think the FBI has publicly available crime data in a machine readable format, I'll see if I can't run it down. If we get a P-value < 0.05, there's less than a 5% chance that the null hypothesis (Oregon's property crime isn't meaningfully different from the nation) is true. If I have the time to do it, I'll get back to everyone with what I've found.