301
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
301 points (95.2% liked)
World News
37240 readers
559 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm 34.
I said liberals not Dems.
I said liberals not Dems.
And learn some damn history yourself. Trump replaced 2 liberal justices which only requires POTUS and Senate. And we learned under Trump that it's much, MUCH easier to hurt people than to help people. Thanks everyone who refused to vote for Hillary. You did this.
You want change? Vote more liberals in. Don't want change? Keep bitching.
Yet again, with the disingenious bullshit.
Liberals = Dems
You just proved my point, dude. Look you don't need all three branches to actual produce results for your base. The Dems don't produce the results we want because they do not want to not because they're powerless.
I assume his point is that calling Manchin or Sinema "liberal" isn't super accurate.
If you think that, you probably shouldn't talk politics. And it's probably not worth the time to talk politics with you.
I've got bad news for you. The democrats are indeed liberals, and so are the Republicans. Perhaps it's you who doesn't understand politics?
You should probably learn political terms before telling people not to talk politics. Liberalism as defined by Oxford.
Oh neat. Here's the definition of political by Oxford.