34
Kim Stanley Robinson
(sopuli.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
34 points (94.7% liked)
Science Fiction
13635 readers
2 users here now
Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction
December book club canceled. Short stories instead!
We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
- Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
- Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
- Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
- Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
After the Mars trilogy, I read 2312, New York 2140, and Aurora. None were bad, but I just sort of ran out of steam with ourobouros and employee collectives.
I think the "ran out of steam" is a good way to describe it. I'll probably end up reading a couple more of his books, but it won't be for some years, and many, many other books, from now.
Maybe try Shaman, it's pretty different from his other stuff. Although I'm pretty biased, I love every KSR book I've read.
Thumbs up for Shaman. I got the strong impression that KSR ran around in the woods at night naked to research that book. Some really interesting speculation on Neanderthals too.
Aurora was the first and last Kim Stanley Robinson book I read. I don't think it'll be a popular opinion to say this, but it was the worst sci-fi book I've ever read.
It took so long to say so little, focusing on irrelevant personal details and plot that had no unique nexus with the premise or setting, while the "sci-fi" plot elements were paper thin and resolve in the dumbest, least satisfying way possible. Really really turned me off of the author.
I'm not sure I entirely agree, but I am sympathetic. It really is an entire book about why one sci-fi trope is a bad idea. There's an almost eye-rolling meta-text that he's done with any traditional notions of space travel and heroic explorers, and that it's time to turn our eyes and brains to earth.
Now, I think I was okay with seeing that story play out, and I do appreciate any author who can hold my attentiona during info-dumps (Hello there, Neal Stephenson) but there was certainly an element of Wagons East! in the book, but not enough John Candy and Richard Lewis.