127
George Santos is running for Congress
(www.semafor.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
127 points (93.8% liked)
politics
19120 readers
3418 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Is this satire?
This timeline is so dark I feel like it owes us this - please let him get elected and booted a second time
No, fuck that. Elected? No. That would affect a lot of people.
I want the debate to be the other guy just enumerating all his crimes, over and over, on repeat.
It feels like a mooch ago we had a man hiding in bushes, we’ve been so over saturated with meme quality politics that I feel we just don’t get the same level of value from it.
But I would still get a chuckle out of Santos being fired and arrested again.
How long is a mooch again, was it 12 days or some such?
This isn't a fucking tv show. This has very real consequences for people.
This timeline is so dark Anish Kapoor tried to purchase exclusive rights to it.
It'd be hard to boot him a second time. Everyone knows he's a liar and fraud so the voters can't really claim ignorance this time around. If GOP voters go for them it's just because Trump has trained them to love fraudsters.
Semafor is a really weird new site by the Buzzfeed guy who wants to "reinvent the news" by using AI curation and short articles with click bait headlines...
They've only been around a year or two. But I've noticed them getting posted a lot of Lemmy recently so I looked into them. It's almost always headlines like this where it's really hard not to click
They also have a "good relationship" with China.
They dont seem to be doing anything shitty right now.
But I feel it's like how internet disrupters like Uber provide great service at a loss till people are used to them.
Once they get views, it's all structured for "the algorithm" to push people towards certain views. If it's slow enough and starts out unbiased. People wouldn't even notice. Especially if the AI curating part is on a user by user basis.
It did seem like an odd format when I read it and was strangely neutral given the subject. I don't think I have read a single article about that dude where the author didn't take some hard jabs at when he discovered cold fusion.
It gets good reviews on the sites I use to check for credibility and bias (MBFC, NewsGuard, Ad Fontes). Hopefully it can maintain this, but as it is new, will have to keep a more frequent eye on it.
That's kind of my point.
If it came out with propaganda everyone would write them off immediately.
So "burn money" which in this case is no return in investment. Because if that's whats going on, they're there for propaganda, and not accomplishing it.
Right now the primary goal would be getting people to use and accept them.
Then the "AI curation" they brag about kicks in, and slowly but surely caters what someone reads to move them in the wanted direction.
It's not far fetched to think one day two people might get the same story written two different ways, with two different sets of pictures/videos.
I dunno man, everything's going to shit, when billionaires start talking about reinventing the news, being cynical feels like being reasonable.
Journalism especially has went from people trying to report the new, to people trying to make as much money as possible, to people with more money then they can spend trying to change minds to control votes and laws.
And it's changed so fast, lots of voters still haven't noticed.
Better source (Washington Post, no paywall)
George Santos is my absolute favorite political figure.
He is unapologetically the most hypocritical piece of shit and hilariously shady.
He is the Andy Kaufman of politics.
He is also unfathomably weird.
Is this just fantasy?
Here we are, the princes of the universe