187

‘Picard’ Season 2 Was Rewritten After Paramount Deemed It “Too Star Trek,” Says EP (trekmovie.com)

submitted 8 months ago by ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to c/startrek@startrek.website

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 74 points 8 months ago

I think this is an extremely lousy headline, but the content is good.

Firstly, the headline slightly misquotes what Matalas actually said (emphasis added):

“We wrote nine episodes at one point and the network was like, ‘No, we don’t really understand this, it’s a bit too sci-fi, it’s a bit too in-Star Trek.’”

I think a story being a little too "inside baseball" and reliant on stuff from decades ago is a perfectly valid note, especially when we're talking about ideas like this:

The idea was that Guinan’s bar was presented as a normal bar in Los Angeles, but if you knew the right thing to do, you could go into the back through the telephone phone booth and that was Rick’s Café and it was a stopping point for all these different species that were actually there on Earth with a ‘Do not interfere’ thing happening.

The stuff about COVID messing with the writing and shooting schedule is understandable, and created problems that can be seen in many TV shows filmed around that time. All the same, it makes me wish they had decompressed the schedule and not rushed through things as much as they did.

The comments about there being a lot of different ideas in season two are interesting, since I think she overall series' biggest flaw is that it crammed a lot of ideas, many of which I like quite a bit, into only 30 episodes, with few (none?) of them being fully explored.

And regarding the Jurati Borg...I don't know, I never found that confusing in the slightest. I think their intent came through just fine.

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 8 months ago

And regarding the Jurati Borg…I don’t know, I never found that confusing in the slightest. I think their intent came through just fine.

Yes, I was surprised to read that there was any misconception. It seemed pretty clear to me that nothing they did in the past would have altered the history of TNG/Voyager/etc.

As I recall, the order of events played out like this:

Picard and crew entered an alternate timeline in the Picard era (25th century, ~20 years after TNG era).
Picard took that timeline's Borg Queen into the shared past of the two timelines.
Jurati merged with that Borg Queen.
They fixed the timeline and returned to the standard Star Trek timeline. Queen Jurati remained in the past. At this time, "Borg Queen Prime" (the one we know from First Contact) was still in the Delta Quadrant, unaffected by any of this.
In the 25th century, Queen Jurati re-appears with her own collective, entirely separate from the Prime Collective we've known throughout TNG, Voyager, etc. From the 21st century up the 25th, Queen Jurati just stayed out of history's way to avoid a time paradox, ensuring that the chain of events that led to her creation would still happen.

I really enjoyed Jurati's story in season 2, and was a bit disappointed that we didn't see her at all in season 3, since she and her collective should no longer be required to stay out of history's way. But at the same time, they set that up at the end of season 2 pretty explicitly. I just felt like if they were going to bring the Borg back again, they ought to least mention that there's a whole other collective of friendly Borg who are possibly much more technologically advanced than the Prime Borg and are kinda-sorta part of the Federation.

[-] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In all fairness, Captain Shaw did mention the Jurati Borg, albeit a bit offhandedly.

"Forget about all that weird shit on the Stargazer. The real Borg are still out there"

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If the network had a problem with the plans for season 2 being too dependent on older stuff it's odd that season 3 still managed to be so dependent on older stuff, considering the seasons were apparently filmed back-to-back. Did the network folks give their notes on season 2 and then stop paying attention?

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

My cynical take is that season three was pretty shallow overall, and I'm not sure there was anything in it that would make someone say, "wait, what?"

[-] pelletbucket@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I'm not going to complain that it wasn't specifically written for long-time fans, but I am disappointed that it wasn't specifically written for long-time fans.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024

187 points (99.0% liked)

Star Trek

10571 readers

91 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.

New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?

Rules

1 Be constructive

All posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.

2 Be welcoming

It is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.

3 Be truthful

All posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.

4 Be nice

If a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.

5 Spoilers

Utilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.

6 Keep on-topic

All submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.

7 Meta

Questions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.

Upcoming Episodes