193
submitted 8 months ago by northmaple1984@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Wouldn't the math would also suggest they could have retained 1/3 of the fired employees if they'd forgone the bonuses?

If the budget is so tight that they have to fire hundreds of employees, why are bonuses deserved?

[-] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Wouldn't be surprised if it was to make sure the experienced and mission critical people stick around, instead of jumping off a sinking ship. Downsizing can lead to a panic where you lose the people you vitally need.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah, at this point we're hitting a level of nuance that would require more information than I have. There was also the surprise budget cut somewhere along the way.

[-] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Right. A company that can lose 800 employees doesn't consider a few million to be that big a deal. Especially if it helps secure future income. Which is kinda the point of the whole thing.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
193 points (89.1% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
767 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS