57
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
57 points (89.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7210 readers
251 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Not really. They word it like that because laws need to look broad, but the purpose is to target TikTok.
One thing I'm absolutely worried about is the definition of "adversary" is too broad, and it could potentially be broadened to include any foreign country that doesn't do whatever the US wants.
The "purpose" is to target TikTok, sure. But that doesn't really matter as it could be used to enforce laws against any other company / country doing something similar. Laws are often used beyond the original intent.
Though if it's not written broadly enough I believe it could be ruled unconstitutional.
Yeah, I'm not Constitutional lawyer, but that's my impression as well. I'm guessing they'll just adjust the definition of "adversary" to match their political aims though.