575
submitted 8 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Since Apple implemented a browser choice screen for iPhones earlier this month to comply with Europe's Digital Markets Act (DMA), Brave Software, Mozilla, and Vivaldi have seen a surge in the number of people installing their web browsers.

It's an early sign that Europe's competition rules may actually … get this … enhance competition – an outcome that skeptics deemed unlikely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Have they actually made non-Webkit versions though, or is it still just WKWebView? A part of me thinks Apple has already kind of won this. They started allowing plugins and such a while ago, and at this point it covers my needs. Safari is really well-designed for phones as well, and the times I've tried using Firefox it just feels awkward and clunky - not because of the engine, but because of the general UX.

I'm sure opinions differ, and I really do hope more people will swap over to Firefox (Brave and Vivaldi can fuck themselves), but it doesn't really feel like a big win unless you get more tangible benefits; different engines, plugin support, etc.

[-] maiskanzler@feddit.de 21 points 8 months ago

I use Firefox on all my machines and I enjoy having my Sync account available everywhere. If I were to get an iPhone, I'd absolutely choose Firefox again.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah this is the one thing I've considered myself. I just can't get over how much better Safari's UI is on iPhones. It's a bit whatever on iPad, but on the iPhone it's just so intuitive. I think the two things I like the most are

~~The bottom of the screen UI Chrome, because that just makes so much sense. Sure iOS has that accessibility feature (which I really hope Android adopts soon) where you swipe down on the bar at the bottom to bring the top of the screen down, but that's one extra gesture I have to use to access the URL bar. Other than preference there's no real reason to keep it on the top - which there's a setting for in Safari, so you could have either way.~~

As I wrote this I was like "but what if there's a setting for it in Firefox as well?" and there is, so consider that point moot!

It also lets you navigate tabs without having to open the tab switcher. Swiping left takes you to the previous tab, and right to the next, if there is no next tab it opens a new tab. It's also really snappy so it's easy to navigate between like 2-8 tabs or so.

So as a bonus thing; I really like the transparency effect. It's super superficial, I know, but it makes the view feel bigger somehow, and it fits with the overall native UX which is something I as a developer generally consider a good thing. Though honestly it's not a dealbreaker for me.

If the tab switching was implemented, and they swapped over to Gecko I'd probably consider switching to Firefox altogether on my mobile devices.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Firefox has tab switching exactly like you describe. The only exception is that i don't think it will automatically open a new tab.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oh, nice! Where do you enable that?

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

⋮ --> Settings --> Customize --> Scroll down to gestures --> Swipe toolbar sideways to switch tabs

At least this is for android. It may be identical for iOS?

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

There's no Gesture section at all on iOS, checked both in the in-app settings as well as the app settings in the Settings app. Honestly the settings page is a bit of a travesty in terms of UX design. There's a "Theme" section that when clicked, takes you to an on/off switch for "Use system theme" and nothing else. Why not just have the switch directly on the main settings page? Maybe under its own subsection, but not a completely different page?

I installed Firefox on my Pixel 6 (work phone, pretty much only use it for Teams and two authenticator apps), and it's a completely different experience.

The iOS version wastes a lot of space, and there's a lot less room for customisation.

On Android the setting was under Settings > Customise which by itself has a decent amount of settings.

And the iOS settings page, slightly scrolled down to hide my email address, looks like this (imgur link).

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

As I wrote this I was like “but what if there’s a setting for it in Firefox as well?”

This is every interaction I have with Apple fans. Except often there's also a "and it's had this option for years". And it's not just Firefox, it's every other option for every other software and hardware.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Not an Apple fan. I enjoy the general hassle-free and polished experience that is their products, but Apple themselves can go die in a fire. I don't "like" any companies.

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Um what did Vivaldi do wrong? Is it just cause it's Chromium?

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah, it's just because it's Chromium. I don't know anything about the company so I don't have any opinion there.

I used to be of the opinion that it'd be nice if the web unified under one platform. Honestly, I still hold that opinion, but the caveat there would obviously be that no single company should control that platform. Google does control Chromium. All Chromium based browsers will see Manifest V3, and that's just one thing. Google can do more or less what they wish, and the rest of the web will just kind of have to take it.

They're in a similar position that Microsoft was in back when Internet Explorer was an actually good browser, but unlike Microsoft I don't think Google will rest on their laurels. It's really worrying to me that Google essentially owns the internet.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

2021: “The rendering engine doesn't matter that much because everyone ends up seeing the same internet”

2022: “How much can google really do with a monopoly on the back end?”

2023: “They still don't control the underlying structure of the internet.”

2024: “well shit.”

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I was foolishly hoping that there'd be some sort of regulation where Chromium ended up being democratised. Fools hope, pipe dream, whatever. It obviously won't happen because I don't think the powers that be quite realise how dangerous it is; it's too technical for them to grasp.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

It's really worrying to me that Google essentially owns the internet.

Lemmings, please Get Firefox (.com) if you haven’t already!

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I was asking because they're generally fairly anti Google in terms of all the tracking changes and such, and while manifest v3 can't be blocked by them the built in ad blocker shouldn't be affected.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's fair, and you should absolutely not feel bad for asking.

Like you say, they can't really block Manifest V3, which in this case sure, their built-in adblocker will still work, but what about the next unblockable change? I've no idea what that might be, but Google isn't our friend, they're a massive, hungering corporation.

I'd honestly be all for these alternative browsers if they decided to adopt Gecko instead, honestly. Until then they're just "Google Chrome But..."

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That is not the complete source code. The UI components are proprietary.

It is what's called "open core software"

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There have been rumors that Apple would open it up for iOS, but I wasn’t sure if they still require Webkit, so I looked it up.

Apparently, in the EU, they can use their own tools as of 17.4 (which just released) but I guess US still uses WebKit.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I'm in the EU so it's been decently big news here. That said I'm having a hard time believing that they'd make separate versions of their browsers for the EU and then the rest of the world. That's a lot of work for a potentially very small market.

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
575 points (98.2% liked)

News

23296 readers
1778 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS