234
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago

I could very easily see Hilary pulling this trigger (or Obama or Bush for that matter).

Obama had reached a diplomatic agreement with Iran on their nuclear program; Trump was a big step backwards there, as he was on Cuba. Even with the DPRK I don't think anything substantive materialized.

Looking at everything reasonable in Trump's favor, he was just as bad as Obama on foreign policy. "He was actually OK there" has always been more contrarian than anything.

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Obama had reached a diplomatic agreement with Iran on their nuclear program

But he held the line on Iraq and even opened up fronts in Syria. If the Iranian military left itself exposed like that? Obama might be willing to take the shot, if he thought he could advance his position further in the region.

Trump was a big step backwards there, as he was on Cuba. Even with the DPRK I don't think anything substantive materialized.

Obama was trying to carrot the Cubans toward privatization after decades of stick. But he was just as invested in an eventual corporate takeover as Clinton or Carter.

Trump was a flailing putz who did everything for attention. His moves weren't strategic past the next headline.

Looking at everything reasonable in Trump's favor, he was just as bad as Obama on foreign policy.

He was worse in strategy, which made him better in consequence. He undermined international institutions and tried to grift NATO states. He made catty remarks and empty threats to look tough, without having any kind of interest in a protracted commitment to any one conflict.

A Trump mix up at the White House would force another big wave of resignations and bring in a bunch of new grifters and know nothings.

Whether that would be better or worse is forever up to debate. But it will erode US statecraft faster than a stable continuous second term.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

He was worse in strategy, which made him better in consequence.

I don't give Trump credit for accidentally harming stuff like NATO because the same rash decisions that did that almost started war with Iran (twice, actually, if I'm remembering correctly). Accidental good is also good you can't count on going forward.

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

I don't give Trump credit for accidentally harming stuff like NATO because the same rash decisions that did that almost started war with Iran

The biggest thing keeping us out of a war with Iran is the Zagros Mountains. Trump bombing an Iraqi air field fucked US/Iran diplomacy for a generation and caused every other government official in the region to take a step back from the nearest American military base. But it wasn't going to initiate a direct attack from Iran into Iraq (because they're trying to cultivate an alliance). If anything, it heightened the support Iran had for Yemen, which culminated in the closing of the Gulf of Adan to... 90%+ of traffic through the Suez? If you want to talk about something that hurt Western nations as much as losing Solemani hurt Iran... Billions, if not tens of billions of dollars, and right through the heart of Mediterranean shipping (ie, Israeli accumulated wealth) industry.

If we can assign Trump credit for that... well... god damn. Way to go, dude.

Accidental good is also good you can't count on going forward.

Biden is consistently bad on policy, while maintaining a pipeline of experienced professionals with long term job aspirations. Trump occasionally prat-falls over his own dick, while hundreds of experienced professionals in the various agencies flee the sinking ship he's created.

I see Trump as a kind-of American Boris Yeltsin. I don't think that will make America a better place, but perhaps it will allow other nations to assert themselves when the US retreats from the global stage.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

But it wasn't going to initiate a direct attack from Iran into Iraq

It did exactly that! There were acts of war exchanged by both sides; we're extremely lucky the situation didn't boil over.

Trump accidentally did some harm to the empire, but we were right on the precipice of a war that would have killed (easily) millions.

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

It did exactly that!

Iran reportedly informed the Iraqi government of an imminent attack shortly beforehand. The United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the attack was intended to kill, however some analysts suggested the strike was deliberately designed to avoid causing any fatalities in order to dissuade an armed American response

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

The goal at this point is for America to become so preoccupied with internal contradictions that they withdraw from the world. Allowing for multipolarity (and God willing, unipolarity from the Chinese).

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
234 points (100.0% liked)

news

24519 readers
789 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS