121

We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 42 points 6 months ago

I mean, it's just dishonest. They don't believe it themselves, it's just a rhetorical tool. Liberals have only adopted that line of argument so they can shame anyone with principles into voting for Biden. If they did believe that 99% Hitler is worth supporting over 100% Hitler, why do they whine so much about Stalin?

[-] edge@hexbear.net 32 points 6 months ago

If they did believe that 99% Hitler is worth supporting over 100% Hitler, why do they whine so much about Stalin?

Because they believe Stalin was worse than Hitler.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 32 points 6 months ago

Then they should put their nuts on the table and admit they're hitlerites. hitler-detector

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago

Is that how you're supposed to identify Nazis?

Oh, man, I've been going about this all wrong. Thanks!

[-] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

They disagree on the fundamental principle that Biden is 99% Hitler.

Haven't you seen /r/WhatBidenHasDone tankies? smuglord

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
822 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS